Abstract surrealism and doodles

Audio Block

Double-click here to upload or link to a .mp3. Learn more

TL;DR.

This lecture explores the significance of doodle art in web design, highlighting its ability to enhance brand personality, foster engagement, and create memorable user experiences. Doodles serve as a playful and approachable visual language that resonates with audiences, making brands more relatable and authentic.

Main Points.

• Doodle Art in Branding:

  • Doodles enhance brand personality and approachability.

  • They differentiate brands in a competitive market.

  • Doodles evoke nostalgia and emotional connections.

• Practical Applications:

  • Doodles simplify complex information in product manuals.

  • They enhance email campaigns by making them visually appealing.

  • Doodles can be used in social media to boost engagement.

• Psychological Impact:

  • Doodles lower defences, making consumers more receptive.

  • They stimulate creativity and imagination in users.

  • Doodles can evoke specific emotions aligned with brand messaging.

• Future Trends:

  • The rise of AR and VR may enhance doodle interactions.

  • Doodles will remain a key differentiator for brands.

  • The adaptability of doodles allows for innovative branding strategies.

Conclusion.

Doodle art presents a unique opportunity for brands to enhance their personality, approachability, and engagement with consumers. By leveraging the emotional and psychological impact of doodles, brands can create memorable experiences that foster loyalty and drive success. As the branding landscape continues to evolve, embracing doodle art may be a key differentiator for brands looking to connect with their audience in meaningful ways.

Key takeaways.

• Doodle art enhances brand personality and approachability.

• It differentiates brands in a competitive market.

• Doodles evoke nostalgia and emotional connections with users.

• They simplify complex information in product manuals and emails.

• Doodles boost engagement on social media platforms.

• They lower consumer defences, making them more receptive to messages.

• Doodles stimulate creativity and imagination among users.

• Brands can evoke specific emotions through strategic doodle use.

• The rise of AR and VR may enhance doodle interactions in branding.

• Doodles will remain a key differentiator for brands in the future.

---

---

Play section audio

Meaning and abstraction in symbols.

Designing coherent symbol systems.

In design work, symbol systems function like a shared language between the maker and the viewer. When that language is consistent, people stop having to “decode” the interface and can focus on what they came to do. When it is inconsistent, the design starts to feel improvised, even if every individual element looks polished on its own.

Consistency as a trust mechanism.

Consistency turns recognition into confidence.

Internal consistency is not only an aesthetic preference. It is a reliability signal. If one icon style is thin-line and another is filled, or one set of shapes is playful while another is rigid, users are forced to ask whether the difference means something. When the difference is accidental, they waste attention on interpretation instead of progress.

Coherence also reduces the number of rules a user must hold in their head. A stable visual pattern allows people to generalise. Once they learn what one symbol means, they can predict how related symbols behave. That predictive ability is where trust grows, because the experience feels intentional rather than random.

Meaning is more than aesthetics.

Symbols compress complex ideas into cues.

A symbol is not just decoration. It is a container for meaning, often carrying instruction, status, warning, or identity in a compact form. The moment a design leans on symbols, it is asking users to interpret. That interpretation becomes part of the overall user experience, because comprehension is inseparable from interaction.

The quality of a symbol system can often be felt in how quickly someone can move through a journey without pausing. If users hesitate at each icon, second-guess labels, or repeatedly backtrack, the system is not teaching as well as it could. If they flow, the system is doing its job, even if they cannot articulate why.

Choosing shapes and marks.

When deciding what a mark represents, the choice is rarely neutral. Shapes carry associations, and those associations nudge interpretation before a single word is read. Good design treats that nudge as a tool, not as a coincidence.

Connotations built into geometry.

Geometry carries emotion and expectation.

Connotations come bundled with common forms. Circles often read as continuous, soft, or whole. Sharp angles can feel energetic, technical, or confrontational. A heavy block can feel stable, while a thin stroke can feel delicate. None of these readings are universal laws, yet they are common enough that they shape first impressions.

This is why “pretty icons” can still fail. If the geometry implies the wrong thing, users may feel friction even when they cannot name the cause. A warning icon that feels playful, or a confirmation icon that feels aggressive, can introduce subtle doubt. The mismatch does not have to be dramatic to be costly.

Culture and context shaping interpretation.

Meaning changes across audiences and settings.

Cultural context matters because symbols are learned, not inherent. A triangle might suggest direction, stability, or conflict depending on where and how it is used. Even within one culture, interpretation shifts by environment. A triangle on a road sign is read differently than a triangle inside a finance dashboard.

Designers can reduce risk by testing symbols against the specific audience and use-case rather than relying on personal taste. In practical terms, that can be as simple as showing a small set of icons without labels and asking what each one suggests. If the answers scatter, the symbol may need refinement or reinforcement.

Building a visual language, not a gallery.

Every mark should belong to a system.

Visual language is created when shapes, stroke weights, corners, spacing, and proportions follow shared rules. A system might specify rounded corners for friendliness, consistent stroke width for clarity, and a controlled set of metaphors for actions. Without those rules, a set of icons becomes a collection, not a language.

One useful check is to place all symbols side-by-side at the same size and ask whether they look like they come from one family. If one looks like it was imported from a different world, users will feel that mismatch, even if they cannot explain it.

Teaching meaning through repetition.

Repetition is often misunderstood as making things boring. In interface design, repetition is the mechanism that turns unfamiliar cues into learned shortcuts. It is how a system educates without lecturing.

Repetition as learning design.

Repeated patterns reduce cognitive load.

Repetition teaches because it creates predictable mapping between a cue and an outcome. If the same icon always opens filters, users learn quickly. If the icon changes location, style, or meaning depending on the page, users cannot form the association. That inconsistency forces relearning, which feels like friction.

Repetition can be applied across more than icons. It can appear in layout structures, spacing rhythms, naming conventions, button placement, and tone of microcopy. The underlying goal is similar: help users recognise the pattern, then use it to move faster.

Strategic consistency, not mindless duplication.

Repeat the rule, not the noise.

There is a difference between repeating a meaningful pattern and repeating clutter. The best repetition reinforces a rule users benefit from. For example, placing primary actions in the same area on each screen strengthens navigational confidence. Repeating decorative elements that do not support comprehension can be distracting.

It also helps to separate “core” symbols from “contextual” ones. Core symbols should remain stable across the experience. Contextual symbols can adapt, but only if the adaptation is clearly meaningful. If a symbol changes because the system is unsure, the user becomes unsure as well.

Brand memory built through consistent cues.

Recognition compounds over time.

Brand identity is often reinforced through repeated cues that feel distinctive and reliable. When users repeatedly see the same icon style, colour logic, and structural rhythm, they begin to associate the experience with competence. That association is valuable because it extends beyond the page. People remember how a system made them feel, and predictability is one of the strongest drivers of perceived professionalism.

This is also where many teams benefit from codifying rules in a small design system, even if the organisation is not large. A simple set of icon guidelines and usage rules can prevent drift when new pages, campaigns, or features are introduced.

Managing ambiguity and anchors.

Ambiguity can invite curiosity, yet clarity is what keeps people moving. The challenge is not choosing one or the other. The challenge is deciding where ambiguity is useful and where it becomes a problem.

Ambiguity as a deliberate invitation.

Open interpretation can deepen engagement.

Narrative ambiguity can encourage exploration when it is contained. A slightly mysterious visual, an unexpected metaphor, or a layered composition can prompt users to look closer. That can be useful in editorial design, brand storytelling, and experiences where curiosity is part of the goal.

The risk appears when ambiguity enters functional areas. If a user cannot tell what a symbol does, or what state the system is in, curiosity turns into hesitation. In those moments, ambiguity is not “artful”. It is a barrier.

Clarity in the core message.

Core information should stay unmistakable.

Core content needs unambiguous expression because it is the foundation users rely on. The primary message, the primary action, and the primary navigation should be immediately legible. This is where hierarchy matters: the design should reveal what is important without requiring interpretation.

Information hierarchy is how designers choose what is loud, what is quiet, and what is hidden until needed. Headings, spacing, grouping, and contrast should make the structure clear. If someone skims, they should still pick up the essentials. If someone reads deeply, they should find extra detail without losing orientation.

Surrealism as a secondary layer.

Use surreal elements as texture, not instruction.

Surrealism can add depth when it is used like background music rather than the main dialogue. Dreamlike imagery, unexpected juxtapositions, or abstract motifs can amplify mood and create distinct identity. It can also give people something to talk about, which supports memorability.

Still, surreal elements should not compete with the functional layer. If a surreal background reduces text readability, obscures buttons, or distracts from navigation, it steals comprehension. The best approach is often to keep surreal layers lower in contrast, lower in detail, or confined to areas that do not carry critical actions.

Anchors that keep users oriented.

Anchors guide without limiting exploration.

Anchors are the structural elements that prevent people from feeling lost: headings, section breaks, consistent navigation, and deliberate signposting. A strong structure lets users explore freely because they know they can always reorient.

Calls to action should be part of this anchoring system. When they are placed consistently and written clearly, they help users understand what to do next. When they are scattered or styled inconsistently, they feel like interruptions rather than guidance.

• Use headings to communicate structure before users read details.

• Keep primary navigation patterns stable across pages and states.

• Design CTAs to be recognisable in shape, size, and placement.

• Allow exploration through optional depth, not through confusion.

Emotion-first design with clarity.

Emotion and understanding are not enemies. A design can establish mood quickly while still being clear. The practical work is ensuring emotion supports comprehension rather than replacing it.

Setting mood with visuals.

Emotion can be established in seconds.

Emotion-first design acknowledges that users respond to tone immediately. Visual atmosphere can encourage trust, excitement, calm, or urgency. Those emotional cues influence whether users feel safe to proceed, curious to explore, or motivated to act.

Emotional tone should align with what the product is doing. A playful tone can be great for discovery, yet it might be inappropriate for payment steps or sensitive data flows. A serious tone can communicate reliability, yet it might feel cold if the brand is meant to feel approachable. Matching tone to moment is part of delivering a coherent experience.

Aligning mood with intent.

Design intent should be felt and understood.

Brand intent becomes believable when visual mood supports the message. A playful brand might use brighter palettes and softer shapes, while a more formal brand might use restrained contrast and structured layouts. What matters is not the style choice itself, but the consistency between the choice and the story the brand is telling.

Misalignment creates doubt. If a system looks whimsical but asks for serious commitments, users may hesitate. If it looks severe while trying to invite participation, users may keep their distance. Design is communication, and mood is part of the sentence.

Guiding feelings through colour.

Colour can steer attention and emotion.

Colour psychology is often used to guide feelings and focus. Blues can read as calm or dependable, reds can read as urgent, and greens often signal success or safety. The goal is to apply colour logic consistently so users learn what the colours mean in that system.

Colour accessibility matters here, because emotional colour choices still need to remain usable. If contrast is too low, mood might be achieved at the cost of readability. If important states rely only on colour, some users will miss the meaning. Clear design treats colour as one channel among several, pairing it with text, icons, or structure.

Comprehension over emotion.

Emotional impact should not hide the message.

Comprehension is the baseline requirement. If the user cannot understand what the interface is communicating, emotional polish becomes irrelevant. The strongest experiences tend to make the functional layer effortless, then use emotion to elevate the experience rather than to compensate for confusion.

One practical approach is to design in passes. First, confirm the journey works in plain form: clear labels, legible hierarchy, predictable interactions. Then add emotional layers: tone, imagery, motion, and stylised symbols. If adding emotion makes anything harder to understand, the emotion layer should be adjusted until the core remains strong.

Technical depth for teams.

System rules reduce drift at scale.

Design tokens can help teams keep symbol rules consistent across pages and products. Tokens are named values for colour, spacing, typography, and icon styling rules that can be reused without manual guesswork. Even in smaller organisations, writing down a few token-like standards prevents “almost the same” variations that slowly erode coherence.

Component libraries strengthen this by pairing visual decisions with behaviour. When a button style is defined once and reused, both the look and the interaction remain stable. This principle applies whether the system is built in a full front-end stack or assembled through tools. For teams working in Squarespace, a plugin ecosystem such as Cx+ can benefit from the same discipline: consistent icon rules, repeatable patterns, and predictable placement reduce support queries and improve comprehension across many pages.

From here, the next practical step is to translate these symbol principles into interaction patterns, deciding how symbols behave in motion, how states are communicated, and how structure supports users as journeys become more complex.

---

---

Play section audio

Narrative clarity, with intentional creativity.

Remove ambiguity from core copy.

Narrative ambiguity is rarely a creative win in primary website content. When a page is meant to inform, persuade, or guide action, unclear phrasing forces visitors to do extra mental work just to decode what is being said. That extra effort is a quiet leak in performance, because confusion tends to turn into hesitation, and hesitation tends to turn into exits.

Clarity starts by treating every page like a small system with a job to do. The words, layout, and order of information should make it obvious what the page is about, who it is for, and what happens next. If visitors have to infer meaning from vague slogans or indirect phrasing, the site is asking them to participate in the authoring process, which is not what most people arrived for.

Write for scanning, not just reading.

Make meaning visible at a glance.

Most visitors do not read top to bottom. They scan, skim, pause, and only then commit to a deeper read if something proves relevant. Designing for scannability means turning dense ideas into smaller, legible units that can be understood in seconds, not minutes. The goal is not to oversimplify, but to present complexity in a way that feels navigable.

Well-structured headings, short paragraphs, and lists do more than look tidy. They create checkpoints that help users orient themselves and decide whether to continue. A useful mental model is to assume the visitor is making a sequence of micro-decisions: “Is this about my problem?”, “Is this credible?”, “Is this easy to follow?”, “Is it worth my time?”. Clear structure answers those questions without forcing the visitor to hunt.

• Use plain, direct sentences for core statements, then expand underneath.

• Break multi-step explanations into numbered sequences when order matters.

• Move definitions closer to the first time a term is introduced, not later.

• Prefer specific labels over clever labels for navigation and section titles.

Reduce friction with information order.

Sequence content like a guided path.

A common clarity issue is not wording, but placement. Visitors may fail to understand a page simply because the page reveals details in an unhelpful order. Strong information architecture puts the “why this matters” and “what this is” early, then progressively introduces supporting detail, edge cases, and technical depth.

One practical approach is to build every page section around a simple arc: statement, explanation, proof, action. The statement frames the idea, the explanation removes confusion, the proof provides credibility through examples or specifics, and the action offers the next step. That arc can be used on product pages, service pages, tutorials, and even opinion-led articles, because it mirrors how people validate information.

When content is heavy, clarity improves when it is chunked by intent. Instead of grouping by author preference, group by what the visitor is trying to do: understand, compare, decide, implement, troubleshoot. If a page tries to do all of these at once without signposting, it becomes mentally expensive, and that is where attention begins to drop.

Technical depth: clarity is measurable.

Clarity reduces cognitive load in practice.

In UX terms, unclear copy increases cognitive load, meaning visitors spend working memory interpreting the interface rather than completing tasks. This often shows up in analytics as higher bounce rates on content-heavy pages, shorter time-to-first-interaction, lower scroll depth, and repeated clicks on navigation elements. Those are signals that the page is demanding more interpretation than it should.

A simple diagnostic is to ask: what is the one sentence that summarises this section, and can it be found within the first few lines? If not, the section probably needs a stronger opening or a better title. Another diagnostic is task-based: can someone answer “What is this?” and “What do I do now?” within ten seconds of landing. If those answers require scrolling, the layout is working against the message.

Use surrealism as a secondary layer.

Surreal visuals can add intrigue, mood, and personality, but they work best when they sit behind the main meaning rather than replacing it. Used carefully, surrealism becomes a supporting texture that makes the experience memorable while leaving the primary content intact and readable.

The key idea is hierarchy: the visitor should never be unsure whether the page is a portfolio, a product page, a guide, or a landing page. Surreal elements can deepen emotion and brand identity, but they should not force users to decode basic purpose. When surreal design competes with content, it often becomes a distraction, even if it looks impressive.

Design for readability first.

Atmosphere should not block comprehension.

If surreal visuals sit near text, readability must win every time. That means controlling contrast, spacing, and visual noise so that the content remains the clearest object on the page. A useful discipline is to validate text legibility against a known standard such as a contrast ratio check, then tune artwork and overlays to support that requirement rather than negotiating against it.

Whitespace is not empty space; it is a functional tool that protects attention. Thoughtful white space keeps surreal backgrounds from feeling chaotic, because it creates separation between decoration and meaning. It also improves scanning, because titles and paragraph blocks become visually distinct landmarks instead of a single wall of content.

Let motion enhance, not entertain.

Subtle movement can reinforce the narrative.

Animation can make surreal styling feel alive, but it should always have a purpose: indicating state, guiding attention, or providing feedback. When motion exists purely to impress, it can pull attention away from the user’s goal. Well-judged motion design is usually quiet: gentle transitions, restrained hover states, and micro-interactions that support comprehension.

A practical method is to test motion under real conditions: mobile devices, slower networks, and distracted usage. If animation delays reading or makes key UI elements harder to target, it is costing more than it gives. Reducing motion intensity often improves the experience without losing the aesthetic, because the brand still benefits from the style, just without the friction.

Respect cultural interpretation.

Meaning shifts across audiences and regions.

Surreal imagery can be interpreted very differently depending on background, industry context, and region. The same visual can read as playful to one audience and unsettling to another. That is why audience research matters even for purely visual decisions. When the site targets global users, it is safer to keep surreal elements symbolic and supportive rather than overly literal or provocative.

Feedback loops do not need to be complex. Small rounds of user testing, comment review, or heatmap analysis can reveal whether visitors are engaging with content or getting lost in the presentation. If the surreal layer improves exploration and time-on-page without reducing task completion, it is likely supporting the experience rather than competing with it.

Provide anchors that guide action.

Even strong copy can fail if users cannot navigate it. People need signposts that tell them where they are, what is available, and how to proceed. These signposts are anchors, and they can be visual (headings, spacing, layout) or interactive (navigation, buttons, jump links).

Anchors become more important as content grows. When a site contains multiple services, products, long articles, or documentation, visitors need help to avoid feeling lost. The aim is not to force a route, but to remove uncertainty about where to go next.

Headings create a mental map.

Structure turns content into navigation.

Headings work as an outline that users can trust. Strong content hierarchy makes each section feel like a purposeful container rather than a random scroll. Titles should state what the section delivers, not tease. When headings are descriptive, users can skip, return, and re-enter without losing context.

This is also where layout decisions matter. If headings are visually similar to body text, the page loses its internal map. A clear hierarchy uses consistent spacing patterns so that sections feel predictable. Predictability is not boring; it is what makes complexity manageable.

Calls to action should feel inevitable.

Make the next step obvious and safe.

A call to action is not just a button; it is a promise that clicking will lead somewhere sensible. CTAs perform best when they match the visitor’s stage. Early in a page, a CTA might offer exploration, such as “See examples” or “View pricing”. Later, it can be more commitment-oriented, such as “Book a call” or “Start trial”. The language should describe the outcome, not the organisation’s desire.

Placement matters as much as wording. CTAs tend to land better when they appear after a section has answered a question. If a CTA appears before the visitor understands the value, it becomes background noise. If it appears after the visitor has gained clarity, it feels like the natural continuation of the conversation.

Navigation patterns reduce lostness.

Help users understand where they are.

Sites with multiple layers benefit from breadcrumb navigation, because it explains location within the structure and makes backtracking frictionless. This is especially useful for stores, resource libraries, and knowledge bases where users often arrive via search and need context quickly.

Another practical tool is sticky navigation, which keeps key routes available as the user scrolls. It is not always necessary, but it can be powerful on long pages where returning to the top is a chore. When used, it should remain minimal, avoiding visual dominance, and it should prioritise the few navigation options that matter most.

For content-heavy builds, internal jump links and tables of contents can act as anchors inside a single page. This is where well-built Squarespace enhancements can help, provided they respect performance and accessibility. A structured content system that supports clear headings and internal navigation tends to outperform one that relies on endless scrolling and hope.

Avoid randomness that looks accidental.

Randomness can be engaging when it is clearly intentional, but accidental randomness reads as a lack of control. When design elements feel inconsistent or arbitrary, users start to question whether the experience is reliable. That doubt can harm trust, even if the product or message is strong.

The distinction is simple: intentional variation follows rules, accidental variation breaks them. A site can be bold, artistic, and unconventional while still feeling coherent, because coherence comes from repeated patterns and consistent decisions.

Build a system, not a collage.

Consistency is the foundation of trust.

A design system does not have to be enterprise-level documentation. At minimum, it is a shared set of decisions: typography scale, spacing rules, button styles, colour usage, and component behaviour. When those decisions repeat across pages, visitors feel that the experience is stable and designed, not improvised.

Consistency also improves production speed. Teams stop debating basics and start focusing on meaningful improvements. This is valuable for founders and SMB teams, because it reduces rework and prevents the site from slowly drifting into a patchwork of one-off fixes made under pressure.

Audit for drift over time.

Quality degrades quietly without checks.

As sites evolve, new pages and quick edits introduce inconsistencies. A periodic design audit helps catch small deviations before they become structural issues. Audits can be lightweight: check headings, check button styles, check spacing, check mobile layouts, check form labels. The goal is to keep the system intact while the content expands.

These audits should include user-facing clarity as well as visuals. A page may look consistent but still fail if the message becomes vague or if the structure stops matching how users think. Auditing both design and language keeps the site aligned with real-world usage rather than internal assumptions.

Test intention, not taste.

Validate choices through observed behaviour.

When teams argue about design, they often argue about preference. Strong practice replaces preference debates with evidence. usability testing can be simple: give a user a task, watch where they hesitate, and note where they misunderstand. Even a handful of sessions can reveal whether randomness is reading as creativity or confusion.

When the stakes are high, controlled experiments such as A/B testing can help compare two versions of a CTA, layout, or content structure. The purpose is not to chase vanity metrics, but to confirm that design intent is landing as intended. If the “creative” version reduces clarity or task completion, it is not creative in the ways that matter.

When clarity, surreal style, anchors, and consistency work together, a website can feel both distinctive and easy to use. The next step is to apply these ideas page-by-page, starting with the highest-traffic or highest-intent routes, and tightening the narrative until every section earns its place while still leaving room for personality.

---

---

Play section audio

Emotion-first design.

When emotion-first design is done well, it helps a website feel intentional rather than decorative. The visual mood supports the message, the content supports the mood, and the interface supports the actions the brand wants users to take. The goal is not to make visitors “feel something” in the abstract, but to create the right feeling for this brand, on this page, for this audience, at this moment.

In practice, this means translating brand intent into visual decisions that users can sense quickly: colour, typography, imagery, spacing, and interaction patterns. Done poorly, the mood becomes noise. Done carefully, the mood becomes a shortcut to understanding, where users grasp what the brand is about before they read a word.

Align mood with intent.

A website’s mood needs to map back to the brand’s purpose and the content’s job. A luxury retailer typically aims for controlled restraint, while a youth-focused platform might aim for energy and immediacy. The same layout pattern can feel premium or cheap depending on the supporting choices, so alignment is about cohesion, not any single design trick.

Define identity through signals.

Turn brand values into visible cues.

Start by making brand identity explicit in operational terms, not slogans. “Sophisticated” can become muted palettes, strong typographic hierarchy, slower motion, and generous whitespace. “Playful” can become brighter accents, friendly rounded shapes, bolder contrast, and micro-interactions that reward exploration. The point is to convert fuzzy words into concrete constraints that a design system can enforce.

A reliable method is to write three to five “mood rules” that the entire page must follow. For example: “No more than two accent colours”, “Typography stays restrained”, “Images must be high contrast with minimal clutter”, and “Buttons must have one primary style”. These rules reduce subjective debates and keep the mood consistent across contributors, especially when multiple people touch a site over time.

Match audience expectations.

Design for how users already decide.

An emotional connection becomes easier when designers understand what the audience tends to notice, fear, and trust. A founder-led consultancy site might need credibility cues fast, such as clean structure, proof points, and confident typography. An e-commerce store may need reassurance cues, such as clear pricing, delivery expectations, and frictionless checkout pathways. Even if the visuals are attractive, they fail if they do not meet the user’s underlying “Is this for me?” check.

This is where basic research pays off. Reviewing customer support questions, reading reviews, and analysing common objections helps identify emotional triggers without guessing. When a team sees repeated concerns like “Will this work for my setup?” or “How long does delivery take?”, the design can proactively remove uncertainty through layout and content placement rather than relying on persuasion.

Respect cultural interpretation.

Colour and symbols are not universal.

Design choices are filtered through cultural context, and even seemingly neutral elements can carry different meanings. Colours, iconography, gestures, and imagery can shift from positive to negative depending on region, demographic, or subculture. For instance, white may read as clean and minimal in one context while implying mourning in another. A hand gesture that signals “OK” in one country can be offensive in another.

Teams do not need to become anthropologists to act responsibly. They can audit key visuals for ambiguity, avoid region-specific humour unless the audience is clearly local, and test meaning with a small set of representative users. When a brand is global, it is often safer to rely on clarity, simplicity, and readable hierarchy rather than culturally loaded metaphors.

Use narrative, not decoration.

Let visuals carry the story.

Good storytelling in design is not a long brand page that nobody reads. It is the way the interface reveals intent step by step: what matters first, what follows, and what action makes sense next. A narrative can be created through the order of sections, the rhythm of headings, the progression of imagery, and how calls-to-action appear when users are ready for them.

For example, a service brand might lead with a clear problem statement, then show outcomes, then show process, then show proof. The mood should support that journey. If the brand wants to feel calm and reliable, the narrative should not be presented in a chaotic layout with competing elements. If the brand wants to feel bold, the narrative should not be buried under timid design choices that look apologetic.

Guide feeling with colour.

Colour is one of the fastest emotional signals a user processes. It shapes expectation before content is read, which is why it needs governance. The goal is not “pick pretty colours”, but to shape how users feel about clarity, trust, urgency, or comfort while they move through the page.

Use psychology with restraint.

Emotion needs consistency to work.

Colour psychology is most useful when treated as directional rather than deterministic. Warm colours often increase perceived energy, while cooler tones often increase perceived calm. The mistake is to overinterpret this, as if blue always equals trust or red always equals urgency. Users are responding to the total system: typography, copy, spacing, imagery, and interaction patterns.

A practical approach is to define a palette that supports brand intent and then define roles for each colour. For instance: one primary brand colour for identity anchors, one accent colour for highlights, one success state, one warning state, and a neutral range for backgrounds and type. This makes the emotional effect repeatable and prevents the interface from turning into a patchwork of competing signals.

Design for attention and scan.

Contrast is a tool for behaviour.

A good palette is less about novelty and more about legibility and guidance. contrast should be used to separate layers, signal importance, and make actions obvious. When everything is colourful, nothing is. When accents are rare, they become meaningful. This also helps performance goals, as users can scan faster, find key elements sooner, and make fewer navigation mistakes.

One useful technique is to assign “loudness levels” to colour usage. Backgrounds stay quiet. Content stays readable. Accents stay reserved for decisive moments such as primary buttons, key links, or status feedback. This gives users a stable visual language, which supports both emotion and comprehension.

Pair imagery with colour.

Images amplify mood and meaning.

Imagery multiplies emotion. Photos of people create warmth, authority, or aspiration depending on pose and context. Nature imagery often creates calm. Product imagery can create desire when lighting and composition feel intentional. The important point is coherence: if imagery is high-energy but the palette is muted and minimal, the message becomes confused.

Edge cases matter here. Stock imagery can undermine authenticity if it looks generic or overly staged. Low-quality images can make an otherwise premium design feel cheap. Overly abstract imagery can fail to communicate what the brand actually does. A useful checkpoint is to ask: would a user understand what is being offered from the images alone, even if the text were hidden?

Keep colour systems scalable.

Build rules that survive growth.

Many teams choose colours once and then drift over time as new pages are added. The fix is to treat colour like a system: define tokens, define roles, and enforce usage. This is especially relevant for fast-moving environments where marketing pages, blog content, landing pages, and product pages grow in parallel.

A technical way to improve consistency is to document colours as design tokens and map them to component states. Even in no-code environments, teams can approximate this through style guides, reusable blocks, and strict rules for button styles, link colours, and heading treatments.

Shape emotion with layout.

Colour sets a tone, but layout makes that tone believable. Users feel calm when information is orderly. They feel uneasy when the page behaves unpredictably. Layout choices also control how quickly users find meaning, and speed has emotional consequences.

Use hierarchy to reduce strain.

Structure is part of the mood.

composition affects emotion through cognitive load. A clear hierarchy communicates confidence and reduces effort. A chaotic layout communicates uncertainty and increases friction, even if the content is good. This is why spacing, alignment, and rhythm matter as much as colour.

Teams can improve hierarchy by being ruthless about what is primary, secondary, and optional. Headlines should earn their place. Subheads should summarise, not repeat. Buttons should be limited to one clear “next step” per section where possible. The result is not only easier to use, but emotionally calmer because users are not forced to constantly decide what matters.

Use whitespace deliberately.

Space communicates confidence and clarity.

whitespace is often misunderstood as “empty space” rather than “breathing room”. It helps separate ideas, prevent visual collisions, and make interfaces feel considered. In many cases, increasing spacing is the cheapest way to make a site feel more premium, because it reduces clutter and improves scanning.

A common edge case is mobile. A layout that feels spacious on desktop can feel excessively long on a phone if spacing is not tuned for smaller screens. Designers can solve this by using responsive spacing rules: reduce vertical padding slightly on mobile, tighten line lengths, and ensure that key elements appear early enough to preserve momentum.

Direct attention with cues.

Guide the eye without shouting.

Visual cues can guide attention without feeling manipulative. Arrows, progressive disclosure, section dividers, and subtle motion can direct users toward important actions. Used sparingly, these cues make the interface feel helpful. Used aggressively, they can feel like pressure, which can harm trust.

A practical test is to watch how quickly a first-time user can answer three questions: “What is this?”, “Is it for me?”, and “What can I do next?”. If cues help those answers arrive faster, they are working. If cues distract or compete with core content, they need simplification.

Balance emotion with clarity.

Emotional impact should support understanding, not obscure it. When mood becomes the main event, users may admire the design but fail to complete tasks. A modern website needs to create feeling while still being legible, navigable, and fast to interpret.

Prioritise usability over flair.

Beauty that breaks tasks is expensive.

usability is where emotion becomes real. Users feel good when they succeed quickly. They feel frustration when text is hard to read, buttons are inconsistent, or navigation is confusing. This means emotional design choices must be validated against practical outcomes such as readability, navigation success, and conversion flow.

A common failure mode is text placed over busy images. It can look impressive but reduce comprehension. Another is low-contrast typography chosen for “softness” that makes reading difficult. Another is animations that delay interaction. These issues do not just hurt accessibility; they hurt emotion as well, because confusion and delay create negative feelings regardless of the palette.

Test with people, not opinions.

Feedback beats internal debates.

Simple user testing can reveal whether the emotional layer is helping or harming. Watching users navigate exposes friction that internal teams often miss because they already know what the site is meant to do. Even a small set of tests can identify confusion points, misread cues, or sections where mood overpowers message.

Testing does not need to be complex. Ask participants to complete tasks such as finding pricing, locating an FAQ, or understanding the offer. Note where they hesitate. Then adjust the design to reduce those hesitations. When emotion supports clarity, users move with confidence, which is itself an emotional outcome.

Use data to validate choices.

Measure whether the mood performs.

analytics can show where emotional design is failing in practice: high bounce on key entry pages, low scroll depth on important explanations, low click-through on primary calls-to-action, or repeated exits before checkout. These signals do not diagnose the exact cause, but they tell teams where to look.

When teams combine behavioural data with qualitative feedback, they can refine emotional design without guesswork. For example, if users drop off after a visually dramatic hero section, it may be too dominant, pushing key information too far down. If users scroll but do not click, the mood may be engaging while the calls-to-action are unclear or untrustworthy.

Establish mood in seconds.

Users often decide quickly whether a site feels relevant. That makes early visuals crucial. The first screen should communicate mood, purpose, and next step without forcing users to interpret hidden meaning.

Design for first impressions.

Make the first screen do real work.

first impressions are shaped by speed, clarity, and coherence. A wellness brand may lead with calm imagery, soft type, and gentle spacing to create safety. A fashion retailer may lead with bold imagery and high-contrast type to create excitement. The key is that users should not have to work to understand what is being offered.

The “above the fold” area is not a billboard, it is a decision point. If the mood is strong but the message is unclear, users may leave. If the message is clear but the mood feels wrong, users may assume the brand is not for them. The best outcomes happen when mood and message reinforce each other.

Use typography as emotion.

Fonts carry personality and trust signals.

typography shapes tone as much as colour. Serif choices can signal tradition, editorial confidence, or heritage. Sans-serif choices can signal modernity and approachability. Display fonts can create character, but they can also harm readability if overused. The right choice depends on what the brand needs users to feel early on: reassurance, energy, sophistication, simplicity, or credibility.

A practical typography system is often better than a clever type choice. Limit the number of typefaces, define consistent heading sizes, control line-height, and maintain predictable spacing between text elements. This improves scanning and reduces strain, which supports an emotionally positive experience even when the content is dense.

Keep layouts fast to read.

Speed of understanding is emotional.

Layout and copy should work together to create fast comprehension. Clear headings, short supporting paragraphs, and visible calls-to-action reduce uncertainty. When users feel “I get it”, they are more likely to stay, explore, and act. When users feel “I am not sure what this is”, they abandon quickly.

For teams working on platforms like Squarespace or content-heavy sites, this also means treating sections as modular units: each section introduces one idea, proves it quickly, and gives the user a sensible next step. This structure reduces reliance on heavy persuasion and instead uses clarity as the primary driver of engagement.

Understand the psychology.

Emotion-first design is not a mystical concept. It is tied to how humans decide. People rarely evaluate information like robots. They interpret, they feel, and then they justify. That reality shapes how websites should be built.

Emotions shape decisions.

Affect influences rational judgement.

Research often cited in this area, including Damasio (1994), argues that emotional responses are intertwined with decision-making rather than separate from it. In web contexts, that means users’ feelings about trust, competence, safety, excitement, and relevance influence whether they subscribe, buy, enquire, or leave. A website can be logically correct and still fail if it feels wrong.

For teams, the practical takeaway is to design for emotional barriers as well as informational ones. If users hesitate because they fear risk, the site should reduce uncertainty with clear policies, straightforward onboarding, and visible proof. If users hesitate because they feel overwhelmed, the site should simplify structure and reduce choices. Emotional design becomes a way of reducing friction in the decision process.

Make interaction feel human.

Engagement grows when users participate.

interactive elements can increase emotional investment because users move from passive reading to participation. Quizzes, polls, personalised recommendations, and guided flows can create curiosity and momentum. The key is relevance. Interaction that helps users get a better answer feels useful. Interaction that exists only to be “cool” feels like a distraction.

In operational terms, interaction should reduce decision complexity. A quiz that narrows product options can feel supportive. A calculator that helps estimate cost can reduce uncertainty. A short guided flow that asks two or three questions can lead users to the right page faster than a large navigation menu.

Use emerging tech carefully.

Immersion can deepen emotion when justified.

augmented reality and virtual reality can create immersive experiences that evoke strong feelings, such as excitement, curiosity, or confidence. For example, a travel brand might allow users to preview destinations in a more vivid way, or a retail brand might allow users to explore products in context. The opportunity is real, but so is the risk: these experiences can be heavy, slow, or inaccessible if not designed carefully.

Teams should treat immersive features as optional enhancements, not requirements. The core journey must still work without them. Accessibility, device support, performance, and content value should be evaluated upfront. When immersive tech supports a genuine user need, it can reinforce emotional connection. When it exists only as novelty, it can increase friction and reduce trust.

Technical depth: operationalising emotion.

Make mood measurable, not subjective.

When teams want to scale emotion-first design across many pages, they need operational tools, not taste arguments. A simple practice is to define a “mood checklist” per template: palette roles, typography rules, spacing rhythm, imagery standards, button hierarchy, and interaction constraints. This is how emotion becomes repeatable rather than dependent on who is designing that week.

For teams running content-heavy sites, it can also help to pair mood work with content discovery and navigation improvements. When users can quickly find answers and move through information without friction, their emotional response improves even if the visual style is minimal. In some ecosystems, a tool like CORE can support this by reducing search friction and helping users self-serve information inside the site experience, which reinforces clarity and trust when done with a consistent brand voice.

As the next topic builds, the same principle applies: emotional intent is strongest when it is supported by structure, systems, and decisions that scale, not by one-off visual moments.

---

---

Play section audio

Practical usage.

Practical usage is where “nice visuals” either become a quiet advantage or a loud distraction. Doodles, patterns, and background texture can add warmth and identity, but only when they respect content priority, readability, and consistency. This section breaks down how teams can use doodles as deliberate design components rather than decorative noise, with guidance that holds up across marketing pages, documentation, e-commerce, and no-code builds.

In most modern site stacks, design choices are not isolated. A single background decision can affect perceived speed, accessibility, conversion rate, and even how content is scanned by real humans. The goal is not to remove personality. The goal is to use personality with control, so the website’s message stays readable, scannable, and predictable across devices.

Use doodles as accents.

Doodles work best when they behave like punctuation rather than paragraphs. They should reinforce what the page already says, not compete with it. When treated as accents, doodles can soften a layout, add a human feel, and guide attention without turning the interface into a collage.

Define the job of each doodle.

Every doodle needs a purpose.

Before placing anything, it helps to name the role: “draw attention”, “frame content”, “signal category”, “add brand flavour”, or “make a process feel lighter”. This framing pushes the work away from taste-driven placement and into intent-driven design. If a doodle cannot be explained in a short sentence, it usually does not deserve the space it consumes.

Visual priority matters more than style. The content that drives the user’s next action should dominate first glance. Doodles can be bold when they sit far from core text, but should become quieter as they approach headings, product copy, pricing blocks, or forms. A useful rule is to make doodles most expressive at the edges of the layout and most restrained near the words that must be read.

Use doodles to support scanning.

Help eyes move through content.

Information scent is the small set of cues that tells someone they are in the right place. Doodles can strengthen that scent by signalling what a section is about before the text is fully read. A tiny icon-like doodle near a section title can prepare the user’s brain for what is coming, improving comprehension and reducing bounce when the page is long.

Used carefully, doodles also create “rests” for the eye. A page with constant paragraphs and identical spacing can feel heavy, even when the text is valuable. Small, repeated accents can break monotony without breaking rhythm. The key is restraint: the doodle should feel like a marker, not a poster.

Protect e-commerce clarity.

Products stay centre stage.

E-commerce pages have a different tolerance for decoration than editorial pages. The product image, price, delivery details, and primary button need to stay calm and legible. Doodles can still work, but they should sit outside the purchase-critical zone, such as near trust badges, section dividers, or supplementary storytelling blocks lower on the page.

Call-to-action emphasis should be consistent. If doodles highlight a button on one page, they should not randomly disappear elsewhere, or switch style in ways that confuse meaning. Doodles should never imply “click here” unless the element is genuinely interactive, because misleading cues create friction and reduce confidence.

Examples of effective usage.

Small touches with measurable impact.

• Accent borders around images or text blocks to create a frame that draws the eye.

• Light highlights around primary buttons to increase discoverability without adding clutter.

• Visual breaks between long paragraphs to reduce perceived reading effort.

• Illustrated callouts inside infographics to improve recall of key points.

• Consistent doodle motifs in social graphics to strengthen recognition across channels.

• Simple loading states with small hand-drawn marks to make waits feel shorter.

• Playful onboarding steps where each stage has a small illustrative cue.

• Occasional doodle headers in emails to add warmth without harming readability.

• Packaging marks that match the site’s doodle language for a cohesive brand system.

Technical depth for implementation.

Keep performance and rendering predictable.

Asset optimisation is the quiet constraint behind decorative design. Large raster images used as doodles can increase page weight and slow first render, especially on mobile networks. Vector formats are often better for crisp lines at multiple sizes, and they tend to compress well when exported correctly.

Responsive behaviour should be planned, not guessed. A doodle that looks balanced on desktop can collide with headings on mobile if spacing collapses. Teams building on Squarespace, or shipping UI enhancements through code add-ons, can avoid surprises by defining which breakpoints hide or simplify decorative layers so content density stays comfortable.

Keep backgrounds low contrast.

Low contrast backgrounds protect readability, reduce eye strain, and keep attention on content. Doodles behind text can feel charming, but the moment the background competes with words, the design stops serving its purpose and starts acting like a filter over information.

Optimise for readable text.

Readability is the non-negotiable baseline.

Legibility is not just about font choice. It is also about what sits behind the text, how the background changes across screen sizes, and how light and dark modes affect perceived contrast. Subtle backgrounds reduce cognitive load, making it easier for users to scan headings, understand sections, and find decisions they need to make.

Pastel or muted tones are often safer than saturated colour fields. When doodles exist behind text, their line weight should be light, their opacity restrained, and their density controlled. A background can still have personality while being quiet enough that the words remain the “loudest” element on the page.

Use colour with intent.

Colour choices influence mood and behaviour.

Colour theory is practical, not academic. Softer palettes tend to create calm and trust, which suits documentation, service pages, and onboarding. Brighter accents can energise, which can work for campaigns, but they should be constrained so energy does not become chaos. The background is rarely the best place for high energy, because background is always present and therefore always demanding attention.

Brand consistency improves when background choices are predictable. If each page uses a different background intensity, the site feels stitched together rather than designed. A set of two or three background rules, such as “neutral for long reading” and “accent for short promotion”, creates a system that scales.

Design for accessibility.

Make the site usable for more people.

Accessibility is not only a compliance concern. It is a business concern, because unreadable pages lose customers, and confusing pages create support overhead. Low-contrast backgrounds can be good or bad depending on the text colour sitting above them, so teams need a measurable approach rather than relying on what “looks fine” on a single screen.

WCAG guidance is commonly used to evaluate contrast between text and background. Using a contrast checker and testing across common devices helps catch issues early. This is especially important when doodles appear behind headings, where font sizes change and contrast perception shifts.

Tips for background colours.

Simple rules that prevent avoidable mistakes.

• Use pastel or muted colours for backgrounds to create a soothing environment.

• Avoid busy patterns behind text, especially near headings and links.

• Test contrast levels on desktop and mobile before shipping changes.

• Consider emotional impact as part of the content goal, not as decoration.

• Use contrast checker tools to validate text visibility and inclusivity.

• Run quick user checks to confirm real-world readability, not just team preference.

• Refresh palettes carefully so design stays modern without destabilising the system.

Technical depth for testing.

Validate across devices and conditions.

Cross-device testing matters because contrast is not perceived equally across screens. OLED displays, budget LCD panels, and sunlight conditions can all change what looks “readable”. Testing should include a range of devices and at least one scenario where brightness is high, because that is where background texture becomes most destructive.

A/B testing can also be useful when a team is unsure whether a background treatment helps engagement or harms it. The point is not to optimise aesthetics. The point is to measure whether users scroll further, click more predictably, and abandon less often when the background becomes calmer.

Maintain consistent placement rules.

Consistency turns doodles from random decoration into a recognisable design language. When placement is stable, users learn the system quickly, navigation feels simpler, and the site earns a sense of polish even when the visuals are playful.

Create a placement system.

Rules remove confusion and speed decisions.

Design rules can be simple: doodles only in headers and footers, only near section dividers, or only as small corner accents in content blocks. What matters is that the team chooses and sticks to it. Consistent placement reduces mental overhead for users because they stop re-evaluating what each doodle means on every page.

Spacing is part of the rule set. Doodles need breathing room, otherwise they crowd typography and make the layout feel tight. If the site uses a grid, doodles should respect that grid rather than floating at arbitrary offsets that look accidental.

Support visual hierarchy.

Guide attention with predictable cues.

Visual hierarchy improves when doodles consistently appear near the same type of content. For example, if doodles appear next to key takeaways, users learn that those areas contain distilled value. If doodles appear near CTAs, users learn where action lives. The same logic applies to long articles where repeated section markers reduce the effort of scanning.

Conversion rate can improve when attention is guided without noise. This is not about manipulating people. It is about removing friction and helping users find what they came for. A consistent doodle system can be part of that, in the same way consistent button styling and consistent spacing are part of that.

Document the rules.

Make it repeatable across teams and pages.

Style guides reduce drift. When the rules live only in someone’s head, the design will slowly fragment as pages grow and new content is added. A basic guide can include examples, allowed positions, spacing guidance, and “do not do this” screenshots that prevent regression.

Component thinking is a strong match for no-code and mixed-code teams. Even in platforms like Squarespace, a team can treat doodles as repeatable patterns within sections, reducing manual tweaks. In custom enhancement ecosystems, such as plugin-based UI adjustments, a consistent approach reduces ongoing maintenance because styling is applied predictably.

Placement strategies to consider.

Use structure to keep designs calm.

• Place doodles in consistent locations, such as headers or footers, to create a unified look.

• Keep generous spacing so doodles do not crowd navigation, forms, or headings.

• Align doodles with text columns, cards, or grid edges for a polished layout.

• Experiment with controlled tests to learn which placements increase engagement.

• Map doodle placement to user flow, not just page decoration.

• Use a grid system to maintain alignment across templates and devices.

• Review analytics and adjust placement when behaviour suggests confusion or distraction.

Technical depth for maintainability.

Reduce redesign cost by standardising.

Design debt appears when decoration is added inconsistently and then needs to be fixed later. A placement system lowers that debt because updates can be applied globally. This is particularly useful for fast-moving teams shipping content weekly, where small inconsistencies accumulate into visible mess.

Template reuse becomes easier when doodle rules are predictable. Pages can be cloned safely, sections can be rearranged without collisions, and mobile behaviour can be handled with fewer per-page overrides.

Avoid visual vibration patterns.

Visual vibration is what happens when patterns, lines, and contrast create a shimmering effect that pulls attention away from content. It can cause fatigue, reduce readability, and make a site feel uncomfortable, even when the design is technically “correct”.

Choose subtle patterns.

Texture should support, not shout.

Pattern density is the main risk factor. Small repeated marks, tight stripes, and high-frequency textures can create interference with typography and UI elements. Subtle textures can add depth, but they should be soft enough that users notice the content first, then the design second.

Contrast management is critical when patterns sit behind text, icons, or product images. Even a pattern that looks calm on a blank artboard can become noisy once headings, buttons, and photos are layered above it. This is why pattern decisions should be tested inside real layouts, not in isolation.

Match the page context.

Different pages need different restraint levels.

Context should govern pattern choice. A landing page with a short message can handle more texture than a product details page where users compare specifications. A tutorial page needs calm zones where steps can be followed without distraction. A support page needs maximum clarity because users arrive there already frustrated.

User intent should shape the design. If someone is trying to decide, buy, or troubleshoot, the design should reduce cognitive load, not add it. Patterns can still exist, but they should be positioned away from decision-heavy areas and reduced in complexity.

Design for mobile reality.

What works on desktop can fail on phones.

Scalability is where many patterns break. A texture that feels refined on a wide screen can become cramped on mobile, where the same pattern occupies a larger proportion of the visible area. This can create a vibrating effect simply because the pattern frequency becomes too tight at smaller scales.

Device testing should include both portrait and landscape on phones and tablets, because layout compression changes how patterns interact with text. If a pattern must exist, it should have a mobile fallback, such as reduced opacity, reduced density, or complete removal behind reading-heavy sections.

Guidelines for pattern usage.

Keep patterns pleasant and supportive.

• Choose subtle, low-contrast patterns that complement the design without overwhelming it.

• Avoid complex or busy patterns that compete with content and interface elements.

• Test multiple options and keep the one that improves comfort and clarity.

• Select patterns based on page purpose, not personal preference.

• Gather feedback from real users to spot fatigue and distraction early.

• Use design tools to prototype patterns inside real page layouts before launch.

• Monitor trends, but prioritise usability over novelty.

Technical depth for diagnosing issues.

Spot problems before they become permanent.

Usability testing often reveals vibration issues quickly because users hesitate, scroll erratically, or miss obvious elements. These behaviours can look like “bad copy” or “weak CTA”, but the real cause is sometimes visual discomfort. Recording short sessions and watching where attention breaks can identify whether the background is stealing focus.

Analytics review helps confirm whether a visual treatment is harming performance. If a page with a strong patterned background shows higher bounce and lower scroll depth than comparable pages, the pattern is a suspect. The fix is usually simple: reduce density, soften contrast, or move texture away from reading zones.

With these principles in place, a site can keep its personality while increasing clarity. The next step is to connect these visual decisions to a repeatable workflow, so teams can scale content and pages without re-litigating the same design problems every time a new section is published.

---

---

Play section audio

Balance content and visuals.

In modern web work, content remains the centre of gravity. Visual design still matters, but its job is to carry meaning, reduce effort, and help people move through a page without friction. When visuals start competing with the message, the experience often becomes noisier, slower, and harder to trust. When visuals support the message, the same layout can feel clearer, calmer, and more persuasive without adding extra words.

ProjektID’s perspective treats design as applied communication: the page should make it easy for people to understand what is being offered, why it matters, and what to do next. That does not require aggressive decoration. It requires structure, restraint, and proof that each component earns its place. A page can look bold and still be content-led, as long as the narrative stays readable and the interface keeps signalling what matters most.

Keep the message primary.

Maintaining a content-first mindset starts with recognising how people actually use websites. Many visitors arrive with a goal, a question, or a moment of curiosity. They scan quickly, decide quickly, and only slow down when the page makes the next step obvious. If the layout forces them to interpret the design before they can interpret the message, the site has created work instead of removing it.

Design as a support system.

Visuals should carry meaning, not noise.

One practical test is to remove images temporarily and read the page like a plain document. If the argument still holds, the structure is healthy. If the page collapses into confusion, then the layout has been relying on decoration instead of clarity. This matters on landing pages, product pages, and long-form articles, because each has a slightly different job, but all of them depend on comprehension before conversion.

On a landing page, the sequence often needs to be: value statement, proof, details, and a clear decision point. Images can strengthen that flow, but they should not replace it. If an image is doing the work of explaining an offer, the text is probably under-specified. If the text is doing everything and the visuals do nothing, the page might be correct but emotionally flat. Balance is achieved when each element reinforces the same message from a different angle.

Harmony on real layouts.

Complement text with purpose-driven imagery.

For example, a services page can use a small set of consistent illustrations to differentiate sections, while the paragraphs remain responsible for meaning. A store page can use imagery to show finish, scale, and context, while the copy handles constraints, specifications, and outcomes. A blog article can use visuals to break cadence and anchor memory, while headings and paragraphs carry the logic. In each case, the visual layer is supporting comprehension, not stealing attention.

Use visuals that earn space.

Visual elements work best when they clarify something that would otherwise take extra reading effort. That might be a process diagram, a comparison, a set of steps, or a single image that makes a concept feel tangible. The key is to treat visuals as part of the information architecture, not as a separate “make it look nice” layer that arrives after the writing is finished.

Clarity beats decoration.

Every visual must justify its attention cost.

A useful mental model is “attention budget”. A page has a limited amount of focus it can hold before people drift. Decorative visuals spend that budget without improving understanding. Explanatory visuals spend the budget and give something back: faster comprehension, better recall, or greater confidence. When the page is busy, the user may feel like they are missing something, even if they are not. That sensation is enough to reduce trust.

Consider infographics carefully. They can be excellent when they compress a complex idea into a small footprint, but they can also become a wall of tiny text that fails on mobile. A good infographic is readable, scannable, and structured like a story: a headline, a few grouped points, and a clear takeaway. If it needs a separate explanation paragraph to be understood, it is probably too dense or too clever.

Brand consistency signals trust.

Consistency makes information feel reliable.

Visual choices should align with a brand’s identity, not only for aesthetics, but for cognitive stability. A consistent colour system, image style, and typography reduce the mental switching cost between sections. People feel that the site is “together”, which often translates into confidence that the business is together as well. In practical terms, it can mean using one illustration style rather than three, keeping photography lighting consistent, and ensuring icons share the same weight and corner radius.

Emotional resonance matters too, but it should be handled deliberately. Photos of people can increase relatability, yet they can also feel generic if they look like stock templates. The visual decision should match the page’s job: credibility, warmth, authority, speed, luxury, and so on. When the emotion supports the message, it strengthens recall. When it conflicts, it creates distrust because the visitor cannot reconcile the tone with the information.

Build hierarchy with structure.

Clear hierarchy is what turns a page into a usable interface rather than a scrolling document. Headings, spacing, and grouping allow visitors to skim, locate, and then read in depth when they choose to. Without hierarchy, even strong writing becomes harder to consume because the user has no map.

Headings as navigation.

Headings are anchors for scanning.

Headings should describe outcomes, not just topics. “Pricing options” is fine, but “Choose a plan that fits” communicates intent. The more precise the heading, the easier it is to scan and decide where to focus. Subheadings then act like signposts, breaking large ideas into chunks that can be understood independently without losing the through-line.

Spacing is the silent partner here. white space is not wasted area; it is what stops the page from collapsing into a single block. Adequate spacing improves legibility, reduces anxiety, and creates a rhythm that supports reading. It also helps distinguish sections so the visitor can reorient when they scroll back up or jump between tabs.

Guide attention to decisions.

Structure should naturally point to actions.

Hierarchy is also how calls to action become obvious without shouting. When the page is structured well, an action can be placed where it makes sense, after context and proof, rather than repeated everywhere. A well-placed button is often more effective than five competing buttons, because it arrives when the visitor has enough information to decide.

This is where many sites accidentally create friction: they present actions before establishing meaning, which forces the visitor to either click blindly or leave. A more reliable approach is to build a progression: explain the offer, show how it works, address constraints, then present the action. That sequence respects how people evaluate risk and reduces the feeling of being pushed.

Create visual anchors.

Not all anchors need to be large images. A small icon, a consistent pattern, or a repeated layout component can create a sense of place within long pages. Done well, anchors help people remember where they are and what each section is for, especially when the page contains multiple ideas, steps, or categories.

Anchors that support flow.

Break long pages into readable segments.

Long-form content often fails when it looks intimidating. The writing may be valuable, but the layout communicates effort before the visitor has read a word. Visual anchors reduce that intimidation by breaking the page into approachable segments. A repeated “pattern” can be enough: short introduction paragraph, a list, then a supporting visual that summarises the next idea.

Anchors can also help with re-entry. People frequently leave a page and come back later, especially on mobile. If each section has a distinct shape, it becomes easier to relocate the last read position. That improves perceived usability even though the content has not changed.

Anchors as navigation aids.

Guide movement without adding complexity.

Directional cues should be used sparingly, but they can be helpful when a page has a step-by-step structure. Icons can indicate “next”, “warning”, “example”, or “tip”, which reduces the need for extra words. When overused, they become clutter. The goal is to guide movement with minimal visual noise, so the user feels led rather than pushed.

In more advanced builds, the same concept can be implemented with interactive patterns, such as collapsible sections or jump links. If those patterns are used, they should remain predictable and accessible, with clear labels and consistent behaviour, so navigation does not become a puzzle.

Reduce mobile decorative density.

Mobile constraints change the cost of every design decision. Smaller screens amplify clutter, compress spacing, and make dense visual layouts feel heavier than intended. Prioritising simplicity on mobile is not a stylistic preference; it is a usability requirement. Mobile users often seek fast answers, and the interface needs to respect that urgency.

Simplify without losing meaning.

Remove ornaments before removing information.

Reducing decorative density usually means removing non-essential layers: background patterns, unnecessary shadows, overly complex image treatments, and repeated visual motifs that do not add information. The aim is not to make the page plain. The aim is to make the page readable and tappable, with the message still intact.

It also means checking the balance between imagery and text. On mobile, a full-screen hero image can delay the moment when the visitor sees the actual information. If the headline and the key value statement are pushed below the fold, the page is effectively hiding its own purpose. A tighter hero, with text that loads quickly and remains legible, often performs better for comprehension.

Design for touch, not clicks.

Tap interactions need space and forgiveness.

tap targets should be large enough to hit reliably, with sufficient spacing to prevent accidental taps. This becomes critical on navigation elements, filters, accordions, and forms. Small interactive elements can feel fine on desktop and become frustrating on mobile, which is one of the quickest ways to lose a visitor who was otherwise interested.

Mobile layouts should also consider thumb reach and scrolling behaviour. If key actions are placed in awkward positions, people either ignore them or mis-tap them. A clean vertical flow, with clear section breaks and sensible button placement, usually outperforms complex multi-column ideas that collapse unpredictably on smaller screens.

Adopt a mobile-first mindset.

A mobile-first approach forces prioritisation early. When the design begins with the smallest screen, it becomes easier to identify what is essential and what is decorative. That clarity often improves the desktop experience as well, because the design decisions were made with intention instead of expansion.

Prioritise essentials early.

Build the core journey, then enhance.

Mobile-first does not mean mobile-only. It means building the core user journey in a constrained environment, then enhancing progressively for larger screens. The practical benefit is that the content becomes more focused. Extra elements have to justify themselves, which naturally improves clarity and reduces bloat.

Performance benefits tend to follow when the approach is executed properly. A slimmer mobile baseline often reduces asset weight and improves loading behaviour. That matters for user patience and for discoverability, because search platforms increasingly interpret mobile experience as a strong signal of overall quality.

Turn constraints into better design.

Constraints encourage clearer information design.

Starting with constraints often leads to more thoughtful layouts: shorter paragraphs, clearer headings, fewer competing components, and more consistent spacing. Those choices make the interface calmer and make the content easier to trust. It also tends to produce a more consistent cross-device experience, where desktop and mobile feel like the same product rather than two different interpretations.

For teams working across Squarespace, Knack, Replit, and Make.com workflows, this mindset also helps operationally: fewer layout variants means fewer edge cases, fewer breakpoints to test, and less risk of a design change breaking the experience on a specific device class.

Test legibility and scanning.

Strong layouts assume that many visitors will skim first. That behaviour is not laziness; it is efficiency. A page that supports scanning reduces the work required to find relevant information, which makes the visitor more likely to read deeply once they trust the structure. If scanning fails, reading rarely begins.

Typography that stays readable.

Legibility is a measurable design outcome.

typography decisions should favour clarity: sensible font sizes, comfortable line lengths, and sufficient contrast. Decorative type can be used, but it should be restricted to short headings where it cannot harm readability. Body copy should feel effortless to read, not like a design statement that demands attention.

Testing legibility can be pragmatic. A team can review pages on multiple devices, in different lighting conditions, and at typical viewing distances. They can also monitor behaviour in analytics: rapid bounces, short dwell time, and low scroll depth can indicate that the page feels hard to consume, even when the content is strong.

Use data to validate clarity.

Optimise based on behaviour, not guesswork.

A/B testing can help validate choices such as heading wording, button placement, and section order. It should be used for clear hypotheses, not for random experimentation. A meaningful test asks one question at a time: does this heading improve understanding, does this layout reduce drop-off, does this call to action placement increase completion, and so on.

heatmaps and session recordings can add context by showing where attention goes, where people hesitate, and what they ignore. These tools are most useful when paired with a content hypothesis, such as “the value statement is being missed” or “the form looks intimidating”. The goal is not to chase perfect metrics, but to remove the obvious friction that stops people from engaging.

Optimise for fast scanning.

Scanning-friendly content is structured content. It respects the visitor’s time by making the key points visible without requiring full reading. That does not mean reducing depth. It means presenting depth in a layered way, where the top layer is easy to skim and deeper layers are available for those who want them.

Structure that supports skimming.

Chunk information into clear, named units.

Short paragraphs, lists, and clear subheadings reduce cognitive load. Key concepts can be introduced early in a paragraph, then expanded with examples and constraints. Lists are particularly effective for steps, requirements, and comparisons, because they transform dense prose into quick checkpoints.

• Use subheadings that state intent, not vague topics.

• Keep paragraphs focused on one idea before transitioning.

• Use lists for steps, criteria, and “what to expect” details.

• Ensure each section answers a clear question or resolves a clear uncertainty.

Visual cues without clutter.

Guide the eye with minimal signals.

Icons and small visual markers can help, but only when they map to meaning. Repeating the same cue for the same type of information builds familiarity. Changing cues constantly increases cognitive load. The principle is simple: fewer signals, used consistently, are easier to understand than many signals used occasionally.

This is also where disciplined content operations help. If a team maintains consistent patterns across pages, the site becomes easier to learn. Visitors do not need to re-interpret each new page, because the same structures keep appearing with different content.

Include accessibility by default.

Balance is incomplete if the experience only works for a narrow set of users. accessibility is not only about compliance; it is about extending clarity to people who interact differently, use assistive technologies, or face temporary constraints like glare, injury, or poor connectivity. Accessible patterns often improve usability for everyone.

Design for inclusive reading.

Readable structure supports all users.

Clear heading structure helps screen readers and helps scanning for sighted users. Sufficient contrast helps people with low vision and helps mobile users in bright environments. Predictable navigation helps users with cognitive load constraints and helps anyone who arrives distracted or in a hurry. The same decisions that create clarity also tend to create inclusion.

When visuals are used, they should not become the only way to understand essential information. If a diagram communicates a key point, the text should also explain that point in words. That dual-path approach prevents the design from excluding users and also improves search visibility because the meaning exists in readable copy.

Refine balance through iteration.

Balance between visuals and content is not a one-time achievement. It changes as content grows, as devices shift, and as user expectations evolve. A site that felt clean a year ago can become cluttered after multiple updates if there is no discipline around structure and removal. The healthiest approach is continuous refinement based on evidence and outcomes.

Build a repeatable review loop.

Review structure regularly, not only styling.

A practical review loop checks a few fundamentals: does the page still communicate its purpose within seconds, do headings still match the content beneath them, is the mobile experience still calm, and are there new elements that no longer earn their place. This can be done during content releases, after campaign launches, or whenever analytics suggests behaviour has shifted.

For teams using tooling such as CORE, Cx+, or Pro Subs in related contexts, the same philosophy applies: systems and plugins are most valuable when they reduce friction and make the message easier to access. The technology is not the headline; it is the leverage. The outcome should always be clearer journeys, faster answers, and content that remains readable as the site scales.

From here, the next useful step is to look at how specific layout patterns influence decision-making, such as how pages communicate trust, proof, and constraints. When those elements are structured well, visuals become a reinforcing layer rather than a distraction, and the content can do its job with far less resistance.

---

---

Play section audio

Consistency in doodle style.

In modern web and brand design, consistency is rarely a “nice-to-have”. It is the mechanism that makes visuals feel intentional, trustworthy, and easy to recognise across touchpoints. In a doodle-led interface, that matters even more because the illustrations often act like small signposts: guiding attention, softening dense information, and creating a tone that words alone cannot carry.

When a team treats doodles as a casual afterthought, the result is usually visual noise: mixed line qualities, drifting colours, and uneven detail that pulls attention away from the message. When the same team treats doodles as a deliberate part of a system, they become a powerful layer of visual identity that strengthens navigation, supports comprehension, and makes brand recall easier.

This section breaks down how to keep a doodle style coherent without flattening creativity. The aim is practical: give founders, product teams, and web leads a method for choosing a style, standardising key attributes, preventing “mixed voices”, and building a reusable library that scales as content grows.

Choose a single style direction.

Every effective doodle programme starts with a clear decision: one illustration style becomes the default language for the brand’s doodles. That does not mean every drawing must look identical, but it does mean each one should feel like it belongs to the same family. A consistent style reduces cognitive friction because users do not have to re-interpret the visual rules on every page.

Align style with brand intent.

Pick a look that matches the tone.

Choosing a style works best when it starts from brand intent rather than personal taste. A playful product can lean into rounded shapes, exaggerated expressions, and informal marks, while a more formal service brand may benefit from restrained geometry, simplified forms, and careful whitespace. The goal is to make the doodle art reinforce what the brand already claims about itself.

A practical approach is to write three to five “style adjectives” that describe the doodles as if they were a person: calm, curious, bold, precise, cheeky, and so on. Those adjectives become a filter. If a new doodle does not read as those adjectives, it gets revised before it ships.

Define what “on-style” means.

Establish boundaries, not restrictions.

Teams often skip definition because they assume the style is obvious. That assumption usually fails as soon as a second person contributes, or as soon as assets are needed quickly. A lightweight definition removes ambiguity. It can be as simple as: “single-weight outlines, minimal fill, limited accent colours, friendly imperfections, no photoreal shading”. That kind of statement becomes a stable reference when deadlines tighten.

To keep the style flexible, boundaries should focus on the “rules of the pen” rather than dictating subject matter. If the rules cover how the lines behave, how colour is applied, and how detail is balanced, the content itself can still evolve without breaking coherence.

Build a reference set.

Use examples to prevent drift.

A small set of reference examples helps more than long explanations. Five to ten “gold standard” doodles, plus a few “almost but not quite” examples, create a shared eye. This reduces subjective debate because people can point to concrete references rather than arguing taste.

For operational teams, the reference set also speeds up production. It becomes easier to brief designers, commission external support, or delegate tasks without repeatedly re-explaining what “fits” the brand.

Standardise core visual variables.

Once the style direction is chosen, the next step is to standardise the variables that users unconsciously notice. The most important ones are stroke width, colour palette, and complexity. When these shift randomly, the doodles may still look “nice”, but they stop reading as a system.

Lock stroke behaviour.

One line weight builds recognition.

Stroke width is one of the fastest signals of consistency. If outlines vary from thin to thick without a reason, the drawings feel like they come from different sources. A simple standard helps: one primary stroke weight for 90% of lines, plus an optional secondary weight used only for emphasis or hierarchy.

In digital workflows, this means defining the stroke weight in pixels for raster outputs, and as a scalable value for vector outputs. The key is to test it at real sizes: small doodles in UI components often need slightly heavier strokes than large hero illustrations because thin lines break down on mobile screens.

Use a controlled palette.

Colour should feel intentional and repeatable.

A consistent colour palette creates emotional continuity. When doodles randomly introduce new colours, they can accidentally shift tone, compete with CTAs, or reduce contrast with backgrounds. A controlled palette usually works best as: one neutral line colour, one or two accent colours, and optional muted fills used sparingly.

Palette control also helps cross-channel consistency. The same accents can appear in web UI, social graphics, and email headers without looking like separate brands. For teams that ship frequently, this control reduces decision fatigue because the “allowed” choices are already narrowed.

Manage detail with a complexity budget.

Keep detail consistent across the system.

Visual coherence often breaks because the level of detail changes unpredictably. One doodle is intricate and textured, the next is a simple outline icon, and the user experience feels uneven. Defining a complexity budget is a practical fix: a rough limit on how many elements, textures, or micro-details a doodle should contain.

A useful way to enforce this is to create three tiers and pick one as the default: icon-level (simple outlines), spot-illustration (a few supporting marks), or scene-level (multiple elements). If the system is mostly icon-level, scene-level doodles should be rare and used only when the content truly needs them, such as a campaign page or a brand story section.

Technical depth: treat doodles like a mini design system.

In product teams, a doodle style can be managed as a small design system. That means defining reusable rules, documenting them, and making them easy to apply consistently. Instead of relying on “taste” as the gatekeeper, the system relies on standards that can be reviewed, tested, and improved.

For example, if a team already uses tokens for UI colours and spacing, doodle accents can share the same source of truth. That reduces mismatches across marketing pages and product surfaces, especially when multiple tools are involved (such as Squarespace for content pages and a separate no-code tool for apps or portals).

Avoid mixing illustration voices.

“Illustration voice” is the personality of a visual language. A brand can have more than one voice across different mediums, but within a single doodle programme, mixing voices usually creates confusion. Users may not articulate why something feels off, but they notice the inconsistency as a lack of polish.

Recognise common voice clashes.

Most inconsistency comes from a few patterns.

Voice clashes often show up as: cartoon faces next to technical line diagrams, sketchy markers next to clean vector icons, or heavy shaded drawings next to flat outlines. Even if each asset is well-made, the combination weakens brand perception because it suggests the brand has no clear standard.

Another common clash appears when teams borrow assets from different sources: stock illustration packs, one-off freelancer work, and internal doodles. Without a harmonisation pass, the result feels stitched together. A clear standard makes it easier to either adapt borrowed assets or reject them quickly.

Write a short style guide.

A reference doc prevents subjective debate.

A lightweight style guide can be one page, but it should be explicit. It should cover line behaviour, corner radius preferences, fill usage, texture rules, shading rules, and how characters (if any) should be drawn. It should also include “do not” examples, because prohibition is often clearer than aspiration.

For operational clarity, the guide should also state where doodles appear and why. Doodles used for onboarding prompts may need higher clarity and less abstraction than doodles used for a playful blog header. Location influences legibility requirements, and legibility should be part of the voice definition.

Adapt to platforms without changing voice.

Adjust scale and density, not identity.

Different platforms impose different constraints, but the voice can remain stable. On social posts, doodles may be larger, more expressive, and paired with short copy. In a product UI, doodles may need to be smaller and more functional. The consistent part is the underlying language: the line weight, palette rules, and shape vocabulary.

When teams need flexibility, it helps to predefine “usage modes”, such as: UI mode (simple, high clarity), editorial mode (slightly richer detail), and campaign mode (more expressive). Each mode stays within the same rules but uses different intensity levels.

Create a reusable mark library.

Consistency becomes easier when a team does not redraw the same concepts repeatedly. A small library of reusable marks creates speed, reduces variation, and supports scalability. This is where doodles stop being one-off decoration and become a repeatable production asset.

Start with high-frequency marks.

Build the pieces that appear everywhere.

A mark library usually begins with common UI and editorial needs: arrows, underlines, circles, highlights, dividers, badges, and small icons. These are the elements that appear across blogs, landing pages, and product screens. If these marks are consistent, the entire interface feels more coherent even before larger illustrations are added.

Teams can expand from there into thematic sets: seasonal marks, promotional badges, feature callouts, and category icons. The key is to make the first set small and frequently reused, because that creates immediate impact and reduces production pressure.

Choose formats that scale.

Vector-first improves performance and reuse.

Where possible, storing doodles as vector assets makes scaling easier. Vectors stay crisp at different sizes and can be exported into multiple formats without redrawing. For web delivery, many teams standardise on SVG because it scales well and can be optimised for performance.

When raster exports are needed, such as for some social platforms, the vector source still helps because it can be exported consistently at required resolutions. The important practice is to keep one master source and generate outputs from it, rather than creating separate “final” files that drift over time.

Organise the library like a product.

Naming and structure are part of consistency.

Libraries fail when assets exist but cannot be found quickly. A clear naming convention reduces friction, especially in teams that move between design, marketing, and development. Simple naming patterns like “mark-arrow-right”, “badge-new”, or “icon-billing” allow quick search and predictable reuse.

It also helps to define a simple taxonomy: marks (decorative helpers), icons (functional symbols), spots (small illustrations), and scenes (larger compositions). When assets are grouped by purpose, teams make better decisions about where to use them and how much visual weight to introduce in a given layout.

Technical depth: enforce usage with review and tooling.

In high-output environments, consistency improves when the library connects to process. A shared repository with light version control prevents accidental overwrites and allows teams to track changes over time. Even without developer-heavy workflows, simple rules can help: one owner approves new marks, every new asset must reference a category, and older assets are deprecated rather than silently replaced.

For web teams, a small integration step can improve adoption: surfacing the library in the same place where content is built. On content platforms like Squarespace, that might mean a shared media library and a documented “approved doodles” folder. In more custom setups, it can be embedded into a component library. In ProjektID’s ecosystem, codified plugin approaches (such as Cx+) can also help standardise how decorative elements are introduced so style remains stable even when pages evolve.

Protect clarity and accessibility.

Consistency should never be achieved by ignoring usability. Doodles can increase engagement, but they can also reduce clarity if they overpower content or reduce contrast. A consistent style is strongest when it supports comprehension rather than competing for attention.

Maintain readable contrast.

Good doodles are visible without being noisy.

When doodles sit near text, colour choices should respect accessibility. A decorative mark that reduces readability is a net loss, even if it looks visually appealing. Line colours and fills should be tested against backgrounds, and accent colours should not become the only indicator of meaning for key information.

In practical terms, this means making sure doodles do not create low-contrast clutter behind headings or buttons. If a doodle is used as a background flourish, it should be faint enough to avoid interfering with text, and the text should remain clearly legible across devices.

Design for responsive layouts.

Small screens expose inconsistency fast.

A doodle style can look consistent on desktop and fall apart on mobile if line weights become too thin or details become indistinguishable. A basic responsive approach is to test doodles at the smallest expected size and simplify where needed. Often, the best mobile rule is: fewer details, stronger outline, and fewer colours.

Another practical guideline is to separate decorative doodles from functional UI. If doodles are used as icons, they must remain clear at small sizes. If they are purely decorative, they can be scaled down or removed entirely on small screens without harming usability.

Keep performance predictable.

Consistency includes load behaviour and delivery.

Heavy image files can cause layout shift, slow page load, and degrade user experience. A consistent approach to an asset pipeline helps: export sizes are standardised, SVGs are optimised, and file naming is predictable. This reduces the chance that one page loads instantly while another page struggles because a single illustration was exported at an excessive size.

For teams balancing content output with performance, a helpful rule is to predefine acceptable file size ranges and enforce them during review. That keeps page speed stable while still allowing doodles to add personality and structure.

Operationalise consistency over time.

The most difficult part of consistency is not the initial design. It is maintaining coherence as the site grows, new campaigns launch, and different people contribute. Long-term consistency is a process problem as much as a design problem.

Introduce a repeatable QA checklist.

Check a few things every time.

A short QA checklist makes consistency practical. It can include questions like: does the line weight match the standard, are colours within the palette, is the detail level appropriate, and does it feel like the reference set. This checklist prevents “close enough” assets from quietly entering the system and creating drift.

For small businesses, the checklist can be a simple internal doc used before publishing. For larger teams, it can become part of a content workflow where a design lead approves any new doodle category or any new scene-level illustration.

Assign ownership and governance.

Consistency needs a decision-maker.

Consistency improves when someone owns it. That does not require a large team, but it does require clear governance. A named owner decides when new marks are added, when the palette changes, and when exceptions are allowed. Without ownership, styles drift because nobody feels responsible for the system as a whole.

Ownership also supports speed. When a clear decision-maker exists, contributors can move faster because they know who to ask and what “good” looks like. The style becomes easier to scale as new pages and assets are produced.

Use consistency to strengthen storytelling.

A stable visual language builds narrative flow.

When doodles stay consistent, they can support storytelling across sections, pages, and campaigns. Repeated shapes, marks, and icon metaphors become familiar signals that guide users through a narrative. Over time, the audience begins to recognise the brand’s “visual handwriting” even before reading the copy.

That narrative strength also supports loyalty. Users who repeatedly experience coherent design patterns are more likely to feel that the brand is intentional and dependable, which can translate into higher engagement and better recall when they return.

As the wider design system evolves, the doodle system can evolve with it. The difference is that evolution should be deliberate: changes are documented, references updated, and the library adjusted with intent so the brand grows without losing its recognisable character.

Next, the same thinking can be applied to how doodles are placed within layouts, how they support hierarchy, and how they interact with content density so the visuals enhance scanning without distracting from the message.

---

---

Play section audio

Abstract art in modern web design.

Abstract art creates atmosphere and meaning without relying on literal realism. Instead of showing an exact object or scene, it uses composition, texture, geometry, and colour relationships to trigger interpretation. In digital environments, that matters because websites are rarely “look at this picture” experiences; they are “feel confident, understand fast, act now” experiences. When abstraction is used well, it quietly shapes emotion and attention while the product, service, or message stays readable and centred.

Web design has shifted from being a static brochure to being an interactive decision space. Visitors scan, compare, hesitate, and commit in seconds. Abstract visuals can support that journey by signalling tone before a single paragraph is read: calm, premium, playful, technical, artistic, or serious. That early signal reduces cognitive friction, because the site feels coherent, and coherence is often what people interpret as professionalism.

Why abstraction changes perception.

When a site leans on literal imagery, it can accidentally narrow interpretation. A single photograph can lock a brand into one mood, one demographic, or one context. With abstraction, the brand can suggest ideas like progress, trust, curiosity, or elegance without being trapped by a specific scene. That flexibility becomes useful for founders and teams who need a site that adapts to campaigns, seasons, and evolving positioning without constant redesign.

From galleries to interfaces.

Digital mood-setting that still stays functional.

Abstract visuals moved naturally into digital products because modern interfaces already rely on pattern recognition. People understand cards, grids, buttons, and whitespace as navigational cues. Abstract styling can sit behind those cues to add depth, so the site feels designed rather than assembled. The constraint is simple: it must never compete with the content. If the background is winning the attention battle, it is not supporting the interface.

For practical implementation, abstraction often works best as a layer rather than a hero. A subtle gradient mesh behind a headline, a softly textured background on a product category page, or geometric accents around a form can deliver personality without sacrificing clarity. This is especially relevant for platforms like Squarespace, where layout systems reward clean typography, predictable spacing, and restrained motion, because those fundamentals tend to survive template changes and mobile breakpoints.

Storytelling without literal images.

Emotion-led narrative that invites interpretation.

Storytelling in digital spaces is often misunderstood as “add a big image and a slogan”. Strong storytelling is actually sequence and pacing: what is revealed first, what is reinforced, and what is made easy. Abstract visuals can become part of that sequence by giving each page a distinct emotional frame while keeping the message consistent. A services page can feel confident and structured, while a culture page can feel expressive and human, without changing the underlying layout patterns.

The key is to tie abstraction to meaning through repetition. A brand might reuse the same visual motif across touchpoints: curved lines for “guidance”, sharp angles for “precision”, layered shapes for “systems”, soft grain for “human warmth”. These motifs become a visual vocabulary. Over time, visitors recognise the brand’s “voice” without needing to read a mission statement every time.

Calm commerce with whitespace.

E-commerce pages succeed when the visitor feels in control. Abstract design can help by removing clutter and creating breathing room, so products feel easier to evaluate. The simplest path is restraint: calm backgrounds, consistent spacing, and a limited palette. When the visuals are quiet, the product photography, price, and primary call-to-action can do their job without competing signals.

Soothing palettes that still convert.

Colour choices that guide behaviour gently.

Colour should be treated as an interface tool, not decoration. Muted tones often work well for premium positioning because they imply confidence rather than urgency. Bright accents can then be reserved for actions: add to basket, choose a size, book a call, download a guide. This contrast creates a clear hierarchy without shouting. If everything is bright, nothing is important.

There is also a practical performance angle. Flat colour fields and subtle gradients compress well, render quickly, and tend to be less distracting on mobile. Heavy photographic backgrounds, by comparison, can introduce slow loading, awkward cropping, and readability issues. Abstract styling can be more reliable across devices because it does not depend on perfect framing.

Whitespace as a navigation system.

Space that directs attention, not emptiness.

White space is not “unused space”. It is a deliberate tool that controls scanning. When a product grid has consistent spacing, the eye moves naturally from image to title to price. When a checkout page has generous margins, errors become easier to spot and forms feel less stressful. That reduction in stress is part of usability, and usability is part of trust.

Teams can validate this with simple measurement. Track scroll depth, add-to-basket events, and checkout drop-off before and after changes. If a calmer layout leads to longer browsing time but fewer conversions, the issue may be hierarchy rather than mood. In that case, a small adjustment like increasing button contrast or tightening spacing around key information can restore momentum without abandoning the abstract style.

Geometric structure and visual clarity.

Geometric backgrounds can deliver the benefits of abstraction while still feeling organised. They signal structure, which is useful when a page contains lots of information: pricing tables, feature comparisons, onboarding steps, or knowledge-base content. Geometry acts like a scaffold. It makes complexity feel mapped rather than chaotic.

Patterns that support hierarchy.

Design cues that reduce decision fatigue.

A well-designed site always has a visual hierarchy, even if nobody names it. Headlines carry more weight than body text, primary actions stand out, and supporting content is quieter. Geometric abstraction can reinforce that hierarchy by framing content blocks and separating sections without heavy borders. Subtle diagonals can imply forward movement, repeating grids can imply stability, and concentric shapes can imply focus.

Clarity also depends on restraint in pattern density. A common failure mode is applying a detailed pattern behind text and then trying to “fix” it by adding overlays. This increases complexity and can make the site feel patched. A better approach is to keep geometry lighter near text areas and stronger near edges, where it adds personality without reducing readability.

Brand alignment through shape language.

Consistency between visuals and identity.

Brand identity is strengthened when design decisions look intentional. Shape language helps here. Angular geometry can express speed, technical confidence, and precision. Rounded geometry can express approachability, wellbeing, and care. Layered geometry can express systems thinking, which suits operations-led brands and platforms that handle complex workflows.

For teams building digital products on platforms such as Knack and integrating automation via Make.com, geometric abstraction can be a subtle nod to structured data and repeatable processes. Even if visitors never articulate it, the interface can visually echo the brand’s promise: organised systems, dependable handling, and clear outcomes.

Fit across industries and goals.

Abstract visuals are versatile because they can be tuned to context. A creative studio can use expressive textures and bold forms without losing clarity, as long as navigation and typography stay disciplined. A SaaS product can use minimal geometric accents to feel modern and trustworthy. A consultancy can use restrained gradients and soft patterns to feel premium and calm. The same core approach adapts because abstraction is about mood and structure, not about one specific style.

When abstraction is a strong match.

Use cases where interpretation adds value.

• Brands selling expertise, where confidence matters more than showing a literal product.

• Products that are invisible or complex, such as software, operations services, or data tooling.

• Campaigns that need emotional impact, such as community, sustainability, or mission-led messaging.

• Sites with varied content types, where a flexible visual system reduces redesign pressure.

When abstraction can backfire.

Common risks that teams can prevent early.

Abstraction can fail when it becomes decoration without function. If the visuals do not help scanning, comprehension, or confidence, they become noise. It can also fail when the system is inconsistent: different background styles on every page, random colour changes, or patterns that do not align with typography. That inconsistency makes a brand feel less credible, even if the individual assets are attractive.

Accessibility is a non-negotiable edge case. Low contrast, busy textures behind text, and motion-heavy backgrounds can make content unusable for some visitors. Abstract design should be tested with real contrast checks, keyboard navigation, and mobile readability. If the design requires perfect eyesight and a large screen, it is not a modern system, it is a fragile aesthetic.

The psychology behind abstract visuals.

Colour psychology is often oversimplified, but the core idea is still useful: visual tone influences emotional readiness. Warm tones can feel energetic and urgent, cool tones can feel calm and stable, and neutral palettes can feel premium and controlled. The important part is intention. The palette should match the desired action. A high-trust experience, such as checkout or onboarding, typically benefits from calmer tones and clear hierarchy.

Curiosity and exploration loops.

Visual intrigue that encourages deeper browsing.

Abstract visuals can trigger curiosity because they are not fully resolved at first glance. That curiosity can increase time on site, exploration of supporting pages, and engagement with long-form content. For educational content, that matters. When visitors stay longer, they consume more context, and the brand earns more opportunities to demonstrate expertise.

The constraint is to ensure curiosity never blocks comprehension. Decorative intrigue belongs around the content, not inside it. If a visitor is trying to understand pricing, the page should not feel like an art puzzle. If a visitor is trying to complete a form, the page should not feel like a gallery installation. Abstract visuals are most effective when they support the mental task, not when they replace it.

Examples teams can learn from.

Apple frequently uses restrained abstraction around product moments: minimal layouts, crisp typography, and backgrounds that add depth without stealing attention. The lesson is not “copy Apple”. The lesson is hierarchy discipline. The product remains the headline, and the abstract layer is a supporting actor.

Gucci demonstrates the opposite end of the spectrum, where abstraction can be bold and expressive, yet still aligned with luxury positioning. The lesson here is coherence. Even when the visuals are loud, the brand system holds together through consistent type choices, spacing, and tone.

World Wildlife Fund and other mission-driven organisations show how abstraction can simplify complex topics. A symbolic visual can help communicate urgency or emotion without overwhelming visitors with raw imagery. The lesson is sensitivity and clarity: abstraction can carry meaning while still respecting audience comfort.

Future directions for abstract design.

Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) create new opportunities for abstraction to become interactive rather than static. Instead of a background, abstract forms can become spatial cues that guide attention and movement. That can be powerful for education, product demos, and immersive storytelling, but it also raises new UX challenges: comfort, motion sensitivity, and clear interaction affordances.

AI-driven personalisation.

Design systems that adapt to visitor context.

Artificial intelligence (AI) will likely influence abstraction through personalisation, where visuals adapt based on behaviour, preference, or journey stage. A first-time visitor might see calmer, explanatory visuals, while a returning visitor might see more direct, action-oriented styling. The useful mindset here is not novelty; it is relevance. The closer the design aligns with intent, the less effort the visitor needs to spend finding what matters.

Even without advanced tooling, teams can apply the same principle today by designing modular abstract assets: a small set of motifs that can be recombined across pages. That keeps the brand consistent while allowing variation. For Squarespace sites in particular, modularity matters because it makes ongoing content operations easier. As content grows, the design system should scale without requiring a redesign every quarter. Where it fits naturally, codified enhancements such as Cx+ style plugin approaches can also support consistency by standardising repeated UI patterns, provided the visual layer remains secondary to legibility and performance.

As abstract styling becomes more common, the differentiator will not be whether a site uses it, but whether it uses it with discipline. The next step for many teams is to treat abstraction as part of an operational design system: defined motifs, documented rules, accessible contrast standards, performance-aware assets, and measurement loops that confirm the design is helping the business goals rather than simply looking modern.

---

---

Play section audio

Surrealism in graphic design.

Surrealism in graphic design sits in the space where logic meets instinct, and where “normal” visual rules are deliberately bent. Rather than aiming for tidy realism, it uses unexpected imagery and strange combinations to surface emotion, tension, humour, discomfort, curiosity, or all of those at once. In practice, it gives designers permission to challenge familiar patterns so the work does more than look good. It makes people pause, interpret, and feel something that is not purely rational.

That pause matters because attention is expensive. Many brand, campaign, and editorial visuals lose impact when they resemble everything else a viewer scrolls past in a day. A surreal approach can interrupt that autopilot. The viewer’s brain tries to resolve what it is seeing, and that act of “making sense” often produces stronger memory. When the design supports a clear message, surrealism becomes a practical communication strategy, not just an aesthetic choice.

Surrealism also carries a useful mindset: it treats imagery as a language, not a decoration. It prioritises meaning, symbolism, and interpretation, even when the outcome looks playful. It can suggest a concept without spelling it out. It can communicate internal states such as anxiety, ambition, wonder, pressure, or freedom, without needing a literal depiction of a person experiencing those things. For founders, product teams, and content leads, that ability to express intangible ideas is often where surrealism becomes valuable.

Why surrealism still works.

Historically, surrealist art emerged as a reaction against rigid rationality, focusing on dreams, strange logic, and psychological depth. Designers working today may not be building posters in the early twentieth century, yet they still face a similar problem: audiences are flooded with content that is optimised for quick consumption, which can flatten nuance. By leaning into strangeness with intent, surreal design reintroduces nuance and invites a slower read.

One of the most reliable outcomes of surreal visual thinking is that it expands what a “message” can be. A conventional design might present a product, a headline, and a call to action. A surreal design can communicate the feeling behind the product, the tension behind the headline, or the human cost behind the call to action. That does not mean it has to be confusing. The best surreal design is structured: it chooses a central idea, then uses unusual visuals to push that idea into the viewer’s mind through metaphor, contrast, and surprise.

There is also a commercial reality: differentiation is often the hardest part of branding and marketing. When competitors are using similar layouts, similar photography, and similar copy, surrealism becomes a lever for distinctiveness. A brand that uses surrealism consistently can build recognisable “signature logic”, a visual world where the audience learns to expect a certain kind of imaginative twist. Over time, that expectation becomes part of how the brand is remembered.

What “surreal” actually means.

Strange visuals, clear intention.

Surreal design is not random collage for its own sake. It is a deliberate construction where the visual choices challenge expectation while still pointing to a coherent theme. A floating object might represent freedom, detachment, or instability depending on context. A face made of landscape might suggest identity, memory, environment, or heritage. The image can be odd, yet the idea beneath it can remain sharp.

It helps to treat surrealism as a method with constraints. The constraint is the message: the design must still serve communication goals such as explaining a concept, shaping perception, or guiding behaviour. Within that constraint, surrealism offers flexible tools: unusual scale, unexpected material swaps, impossible lighting, contradictory textures, and visual mashups that would never occur in real life.

Dreamlike compositions in practice.

Dreamlike composition is often the entry point for surrealism because it changes the “physics” of a scene. Objects float, shadows behave oddly, proportions distort, and settings blend into one another. This blurring of reality and imagination can be used to create wonder, but it can also be used to communicate uncertainty or tension. The key is to decide what emotional reaction the scene should create, then build the composition around that reaction.

In digital design, dreamlike scenes can be built for websites, campaigns, hero banners, album artwork, and editorial layouts. A landing page for a creative product might use a surreal header illustration that suggests possibility and experimentation. A long-form article might use surreal visuals to represent abstract topics such as burnout, ambition, or cultural change. Even within a small space, such as a social thumbnail, dreamlike logic can signal that the content will not be generic.

Surreal compositions work particularly well when the design encourages exploration. When a website feels like a world rather than a brochure, the viewer is more likely to browse. That can support practical outcomes such as lower bounce rate, higher scroll depth, and stronger brand recall. The design does not need to be complex to achieve this. A single focal surprise in an otherwise clean layout can be enough to shift the viewer from passive scrolling to active attention.

Composition techniques to try.

Simple tricks with high impact.

• Use impossible scale shifts, such as a tiny building inside a teacup or a giant hand holding a city.

• Swap materials, such as glass clouds, paper water, or stone fabric, to create instant visual tension.

• Layer realities by blending two environments into one horizon, such as a bedroom turning into a coastline.

• Use “floating logic” where objects hover without explanation, then support it with consistent lighting.

• Introduce a single surreal anchor in a clean composition, so the viewer knows where to look first.

These techniques become stronger when paired with disciplined layout decisions. Good spacing, clear hierarchy, and controlled contrast keep the design readable while the surreal element creates the emotional hook. Surrealism does not have to mean clutter. It can be minimal and still feel uncanny.

Symbolism and metaphor layers.

Symbolism is where surrealism moves from “interesting” to “meaningful”. A symbolic object invites interpretation, and that interpretation becomes part of the viewing experience. In graphic design, symbolism is useful because it can communicate concepts that would otherwise require long explanations. A broken clock can suggest time pressure, distortion, or lost control. A staircase to nowhere can suggest ambition, futility, or endless striving. The visual becomes a shortcut to a complex idea.

Metaphor adds another layer by connecting two unrelated things to create a new meaning. This is where surreal design excels: it can place a familiar object into an unfamiliar role, and that role shift creates insight. A phone that grows roots can suggest dependency or permanence. A shopping trolley filled with smoke can suggest emptiness behind consumption. The viewer is not just looking at the image, they are completing the message through interpretation.

When symbolism and metaphor are used well, they can cross cultural boundaries because many emotional themes are shared. Not every symbol is universal, though, so it helps to test assumptions. Some imagery can carry different meanings across regions, industries, or age groups. A practical approach is to keep the core metaphor simple, then support it with context through copy, supporting visuals, or the surrounding narrative.

Building meaning without confusion.

Interpretation needs a handrail.

Surreal design can fail when it asks the viewer to solve too many puzzles at once. A strong method is to create one main meaning layer, then use secondary elements as reinforcement rather than additional riddles. If the main idea is “overwhelm”, keep that as the dominant signal through composition, colour, and scale. Supporting symbols can echo it, but they should not compete with it.

A useful test is the “one sentence read”. If the designer had to explain the work in one plain sentence, could they do it? If not, the design may be leaning into ambiguity rather than intention. Ambiguity can be a choice, especially in art and entertainment, yet commercial design usually benefits from at least one stable thread that the viewer can hold on to.

Typography and colour choices.

Typography in surreal design often behaves like an image rather than a label. Letters can bend, stretch, melt, collide, or integrate into a scene. That does not mean readability should be sacrificed. Instead, it suggests a hierarchy: key words may be expressive, while supporting text remains clean. This contrast allows the typography to add emotion without turning the message into noise.

Colour palette choices can also shift the psychological tone quickly. Unnatural colour in skin, sky, shadows, or everyday objects creates instant unreality. High-saturation combinations can feel energetic or chaotic, while muted surreal palettes can feel eerie, nostalgic, or dreamlike. The practical goal is to align colour emotion with message emotion. A brand that wants playful curiosity may lean towards bright contrast, while a campaign about environmental damage may use strange, sickly tones to create discomfort and reflection.

Designers can also use colour as a structural tool. Surreal imagery can be visually complex, so colour can guide attention. A single accent hue can lead the eye to the key symbol. Repeated colour cues can link separate elements into one story. When the imagery is intentionally strange, strong typographic hierarchy and controlled colour decisions become even more important for clarity.

Type and colour guardrails.

Expressive, yet still legible.

• Let display type be experimental, but keep body text predictable and easy to scan.

• Use distortion sparingly, especially for navigation labels and calls to action in digital products.

• Keep contrast intentional, so the surreal scene does not bury the message.

• Use colour repetition to “stitch” disparate elements into a single visual story.

• Check accessibility early, as unusual palettes can reduce readability without obvious warning.

Non-linear narratives and critique.

Surrealism often rejects linear storytelling and embraces fragments: a collage of ideas that the viewer assembles into meaning. In design terms, this can look like disjointed scenes, abrupt transitions, or visual sequences that feel like memory rather than chronology. This approach can be effective in posters, editorial spreads, album campaigns, and brand worlds that aim to feel like a universe rather than a product catalogue.

A fragmented narrative can also increase interaction. When the viewer is invited to connect pieces, they spend longer with the work. That extra time is not guaranteed, though. It depends on whether the fragments feel purposeful. The design needs a reason for being fragmented, such as representing complexity, uncertainty, contradiction, or layered identity. Without that reason, the work risks feeling like decoration.

Surrealism also has a long tradition of critique. In modern graphic design, it can be used to comment on consumerism, environmental collapse, social inequality, or the absurdities of digital life. The surreal scene allows exaggeration, and exaggeration can reveal truths that literal imagery can hide. A city made of disposable packaging can visualise waste more sharply than a stock photo of a landfill. A character with a screen for a face can suggest identity being shaped by platforms without needing a paragraph of explanation.

Technical depth for digital teams.

Surreal visuals still need systems.

When surrealism is applied to web and product design, it benefits from practical constraints: performance budgets, responsive layouts, and consistent component behaviour. A surreal hero animation may look impressive, yet it can also increase load time, reduce usability, or distract from conversion if it is not engineered carefully. In those cases, the solution is usually not “remove creativity”, it is “package creativity responsibly”.

Teams can treat surreal assets like any other feature: compress images, lazy-load non-critical media, reserve space to avoid layout shift, and keep interaction predictable. Surreal imagery works best when the user journey stays clear. If navigation becomes confusing, the viewer associates the confusion with the brand rather than with the intended artistic tension.

Technology, immersion, and new mediums.

As tools evolve, surreal design can become more immersive. It is no longer limited to static posters or still images. Motion design, interactive scroll experiences, and playful micro-interactions can all support surreal storytelling. A user might hover and see an object transform, scroll and watch a scene mutate, or tap and reveal a hidden symbolic layer. The surreal effect becomes participatory, which can deepen engagement when the interaction serves the narrative.

Virtual reality offers an even more literal form of immersion, allowing users to step into a dreamlike environment. Augmented reality can bring surreal elements into physical space, turning packaging, posters, or public installations into interactive experiences. These mediums can be powerful, yet they are not automatically effective. They need a clear reason to exist. If the AR layer is only a novelty, it may spike curiosity briefly and then be forgotten. If it reveals meaning, teaches something, or creates emotional impact, it becomes memorable.

Artificial intelligence is also changing surrealism by accelerating ideation and variation. It can help designers explore visual directions quickly, generate rough concepts for moodboarding, or prototype strange combinations that a human might not think of immediately. That speed can be useful, but it also raises the importance of human judgement. Surrealism is not only about unusual visuals, it is about choosing the right unusual visual. Curation, intention, and craft remain central.

Brand differentiation without gimmicks.

In branding, surrealism can separate a company from a sea of sameness, especially in markets where competitors use identical visual tropes. It can turn a brand into a world with its own rules. The risk is that surrealism becomes a costume rather than a language. If every campaign uses random oddness without a stable theme, the brand can feel inconsistent. Consistency is built by defining a small set of recurring motifs, textures, compositions, or symbolic patterns that tie the work together.

Brand identity can incorporate surrealism at different levels of intensity. Some brands may use it only in campaign art, keeping core UI and product visuals clean. Others may build surrealism into their entire ecosystem, from packaging to web design to motion language. The right level depends on audience expectations, category norms, and the emotional role the brand wants to play. A creative studio might go bolder than a regulated financial service, yet even conservative categories can use subtle surreal signals to stand out while staying trustworthy.

Surreal branding works best when it respects the audience’s intelligence. It does not need to explain every symbol. It needs to make the viewer feel that the strangeness is purposeful. That feeling can be the start of loyalty: people return to brands that make them feel something distinctive, especially when the experience remains usable and clear.

Blending styles and collaborating.

Surrealism rarely exists in isolation in contemporary design. It often blends with minimalism, pop art, retro-futurism, brutalist layouts, or editorial grid systems. This hybrid approach can make surreal visuals more accessible. A clean grid can make strange imagery feel deliberate rather than chaotic. A minimal layout can give surreal elements room to breathe. Pop-inspired colour can make surreal metaphors feel energetic rather than unsettling.

Collaboration also strengthens surreal work. Illustrators, 3D artists, photographers, typographers, and motion designers often contribute different strengths. A designer may define the concept and composition while a specialist builds the impossible scene. That teamwork can elevate craft and reduce the risk of surrealism turning into a rough collage without depth.

Education and community play a role too. When designers share techniques, references, and experiments, surrealism evolves. The movement stays alive because people keep testing what “unreal” can mean in new cultural contexts. That can inspire younger designers to take creative risks while still respecting communication goals and technical constraints.

Keeping it effective over time.

Surrealism remains relevant because it adapts. The core idea is stable: use the unexpected to reveal meaning and emotion. The execution changes with tools, platforms, and audience habits. What once lived mainly in print can now live in interactive web experiences, social motion assets, and immersive environments. As design teams continue to balance creativity with performance and clarity, surrealism can function as a strategic lever rather than a stylistic indulgence.

A practical way to sustain surrealism is to treat it like any other design approach: document what works, measure responses where possible, and refine based on feedback. Not every surreal concept lands. Some metaphors will be too obscure, some visuals will distract, and some compositions will feel clever but empty. Iteration is part of the process, and it is often what separates memorable surreal design from visual noise.

From here, the discussion can move naturally into how designers choose the right style for the right context, weighing brand tone, audience needs, accessibility, and delivery medium, so creative ambition still results in clear communication and measurable impact.

---

---

Play section audio

Doodle branding for modern brands.

Doodle art has become a practical branding lever for teams that want their communication to feel less corporate and more human. It introduces imperfections on purpose, which can soften the distance between a business and the people it serves. Where polished graphics can sometimes feel “finished” to the point of being untouchable, doodles can feel like a conversation starter. That shift matters in digital contexts, where customers often judge tone and trustworthiness within seconds.

When doodles are done well, they communicate brand personality without needing a paragraph of explanation. They can signal friendliness, curiosity, playfulness, or a maker mindset. They can also reduce intimidation, which is useful when a brand needs to explain something complex, such as software pricing, onboarding steps, or technical configuration. A doodle can act as a gentle invitation: “this is approachable, and it is okay not to know everything yet”.

Why doodles feel human.

Brands are often built in environments where clarity, speed, and consistency are treated as priorities. Doodles can support those priorities while changing how the message lands emotionally. They do not replace strategic design. They add texture to it, making the experience feel less like a transaction and more like a relationship. That human signal can be especially effective for service businesses, SaaS products, and agencies that need trust before purchase.

Approachability without losing clarity.

Warm tone, still structured.

The strongest doodle systems keep the core information crisp while using illustration to reduce friction. The goal is not decoration for decoration’s sake. The goal is to lower hesitation and improve comprehension by making a page feel welcoming. In practice, that means doodles should reinforce hierarchy, not compete with it. Headlines should still read cleanly, calls to action should remain obvious, and product details should stay scannable.

A common pattern is to place small sketches near moments of uncertainty. For example, a pricing page can include a small character or icon next to “Cancel anytime” to reduce anxiety. An onboarding checklist can include a doodle next to “Connect your domain” to make the step feel less daunting. These are small interventions that can change how long someone stays on the page and how confident they feel about moving forward.

Authenticity in a polished world.

Signals that feel earned.

Modern audiences are saturated with templates and stock visuals. Doodles stand out because they look authored. That sense of authorship can support authenticity, which is often what founders and small teams are trying to communicate: “there are real people behind this”. The trick is to keep the doodle style aligned with the business’s voice. A playful brand can lean into whimsy. A more serious brand can use restrained line work, minimal shading, and tighter composition so the result feels calm rather than chaotic.

Authenticity also comes from repetition and restraint. A single doodle on a page can feel like a gimmick. A consistent, well-governed set of doodles across product screens, help content, and lifecycle communication can feel like a real design language. That consistency is what turns a cute idea into a credible system.

Differentiation and recall.

Competitive markets often push brands toward the same aesthetic outcomes. Modern, minimal, clean, safe. Doodles can break that pattern, creating distinctive cues that are easier to remember than generic interface polish. They help a brand become recognisable by feel, not just by logo. That matters because people rarely remember every detail of a product, but they do remember how it made them feel.

From “nice” to memorable.

Distinct cues beat generic polish.

Doodles can strengthen visual identity by adding recognisable motifs, characters, or icons that recur across touchpoints. For example, a consistent set of hand-drawn icons used in navigation, empty states, and feature explanations can become a signature. This improves recognition even when the logo is not present, such as inside email previews, social snippets, or embedded widgets.

They can also support brand recall by creating “sticky” scenes. A small narrative illustration explaining a workflow can be remembered more easily than a paragraph of text. The memory is not just the information. It is the situation that the doodle frames, which makes the message easier to retrieve later.

Real-world examples that worked.

Playful illustration with purpose.

Brands such as Mailchimp have used illustrations to make technical topics feel lighter and less intimidating, especially around marketing automation and audience management. The value is not only aesthetic. It is comprehension. When the visuals support the message, complex concepts feel easier to approach, which reduces drop-off during learning moments.

Similarly, Dropbox has used illustration styles to humanise a product that could otherwise feel purely utilitarian. When a technology brand feels “cold”, users often project that coldness onto the support experience, the billing process, and the sense of control. Friendly visuals can counterbalance that, making the brand feel more cooperative and less like a machine.

Community-driven brands such as Threadless show another angle: doodles can become a platform behaviour rather than a marketing asset. When customers contribute to the visual culture, the brand becomes a shared identity. That community ownership can be hard for competitors to replicate, because it is built over time through participation, not purchased through a single campaign.

Learning design in manuals.

Product manuals are often treated as an afterthought, yet they are one of the most important trust moments in the customer journey. If a customer struggles to understand setup, the brand pays for it through support requests, refunds, negative reviews, and reduced product adoption. Doodles can make manuals clearer and more engaging, but only when they are used to support instruction rather than to entertain.

Simplifying complex instructions.

Visual steps reduce confusion.

Doodles can reduce cognitive load by translating abstract instructions into simple visual cues. This is most effective when the doodle focuses on one decision at a time. For example, “Press and hold the button for 3 seconds” can be paired with a simple sketch of a finger holding a button and a small “3s” indicator. The doodle does not need detail. It needs clarity.

Manuals also benefit from doodles when they handle edge cases. If a product can be set up in two different ways, doodles can show the fork in the path. If a cable must be inserted in a specific orientation, a simple “wrong vs right” doodle can prevent mistakes that would otherwise lead to frustration and support tickets.

Structure still matters.

Illustration should not replace hierarchy.

A manual that relies on visuals but lacks structure often becomes harder to use. A practical approach is to treat doodles as a layer on top of good information design. That includes consistent headings, predictable step numbering, clear warnings, and legible spacing. The doodle layer should reinforce those elements, not compete with them.

For teams building manuals for digital products, this same principle applies to help centres and knowledge bases. Doodles can make “how-to” pages more friendly, but the underlying information architecture must still be sound. If navigation is poor, no illustration style can compensate for missing structure.

Email campaigns with personality.

Email is often where a brand’s tone is tested most harshly. People scan quickly, they ignore aggressively, and they delete without mercy. Doodles can help emails earn attention, but the best results come when the doodle supports the message goal: onboarding, activation, retention, or re-engagement. Used carelessly, doodles can look like filler. Used intentionally, they can make communication feel personal.

Breaking up dense messaging.

Fast scanning, clear emphasis.

Doodles can improve readability by punctuating long blocks of text and giving the eye a reset point. This is useful when an email must communicate multiple steps, such as confirming an account, setting preferences, and understanding next actions. A simple doodle can act like a section divider, signalling that the reader has moved to a new idea.

They can also support persuasion without feeling salesy. A small illustration next to a feature highlight can create curiosity without shouting. This is particularly useful for brands that want to educate rather than aggressively push, such as product-led SaaS or service businesses building trust over time.

Practical best practices.

Consistency beats intensity.

• Keep doodles directly relevant to the point being made, so they clarify rather than distract.

• Maintain a consistent doodle style across campaigns to reinforce recognition.

• Use doodles to support hierarchy, such as marking key steps, warnings, or next actions.

• Ensure doodles do not overpower buttons or links, especially on mobile layouts.

• Test placement and scale, since the same illustration can feel helpful or noisy depending on layout density.

Social content that travels.

Social platforms reward content that earns an immediate pause. Doodles can do that because they look different from typical promotional design. They can also support storytelling, which is where many brands struggle: turning a product or service into a narrative people want to follow. A doodle can be the simplest way to make a message feel like a scene rather than a statement.

Promotion without looking like promotion.

Light visuals, strong message.

Doodles can frame key announcements in a way that feels less like an advert and more like a moment. For example, a product update can be introduced with a small illustrated “before and after” concept, or a new feature can be shown as a character discovering something. This style creates movement in the mind even when the asset is static.

Doodles also support simplified explanation formats, such as micro-infographics. If a business needs to explain a three-step process, a doodle icon for each step can make the content easier to understand and more likely to be shared. This matters for founders and SMB owners who want content that teaches and travels, without requiring a high production budget.

Community-led doodle formats.

Participation builds brand gravity.

User participation works especially well with doodle formats because they feel low barrier. People are often more willing to draw something simple than to produce a polished design. Encouraging user-generated content around prompts (such as “draw your workflow pain point” or “sketch your dream feature”) can produce both engagement and insight. The engagement is obvious. The insight is often overlooked: doodles can reveal how people mentally model a product, which helps improve onboarding and messaging.

Animated versions can add another layer. Simple motion, like a line drawing that builds itself, can catch attention in short video formats. Using animated doodles sparingly can increase retention without requiring full video production, as long as the movement supports comprehension and does not feel like a looped gimmick.

Nostalgia and emotional memory.

Doodles often trigger a sense of earlier life stages, when drawing was casual and unpolished. That emotional association can be useful for brands because it creates warmth and familiarity. When people feel comfortable, they are more likely to explore, ask questions, and return. Emotional tone is not a soft detail. It influences decisions, especially in markets where many products look identical on paper.

Packaging and delightful surprises.

Small moments, lasting impact.

Doodles can elevate packaging by adding unexpected moments that feel personal, such as a small character on an insert card or a playful icon near instructions. This can increase perceived care, which is a powerful signal for quality. It also creates shareable moments, which can lead to organic visibility on social channels when customers post unboxing content.

For digital products, the equivalent is the “micro moment” inside the interface: empty states, confirmation screens, and error messages. A small doodle in these moments can reduce frustration and make the experience feel more forgiving, which can improve retention over time.

Emotions can be designed.

Intentional tone beats accidental tone.

Brands can use doodles strategically as part of emotional design. Different styles can influence the mood of the experience. Bold, energetic marks can signal momentum. Softer line work can signal calm. The key is that the doodle style should match the feeling the brand wants to create at that point in the journey. A playful doodle might be perfect for a welcome email but inappropriate for a serious billing warning.

When tone is intentional, the brand becomes more predictable, and predictability builds trust. People may not describe it that way, but they feel it: the brand behaves consistently, which reduces mental effort and increases comfort.

Psychology and consumer behaviour.

Visuals influence perception, and perception influences decisions. Doodles can lower defensive reactions because they often feel informal. That informality can make people more open to receiving information, especially when they are already sceptical of marketing language. This effect is not magic. It is a psychological response to cues that signal friendliness and lower stakes.

Participation beats passive reading.

People connect through interpretation.

Doodles can invite interpretation, which turns the viewer into an active participant. That participation can strengthen a brand narrative, because people are not just consuming a message, they are mentally completing it. A simple illustration can prompt someone to imagine themselves using a product, solving a problem, or joining a community. That imagination increases emotional involvement and can make the message more memorable.

This is also why doodles can improve educational content. If a brand is teaching a concept, doodles can help anchor the idea visually, so the audience remembers the lesson and associates the brand with clarity. For content teams, this can support SEO outcomes indirectly by increasing dwell time and reducing bounce, since people are more likely to stay when the content feels accessible.

Technical depth and attention mechanics.

Reducing friction through cognitive scaffolding.

From a cognitive perspective, doodles can act as “scaffolding”, guiding attention through a page. They can create visual landmarks that help people orient themselves, especially on long pages. This is most effective when the doodles map to the information structure: one motif per section, consistent iconography for repeated concepts, and clear spacing rules so the page remains readable.

Teams can treat doodles as part of a design system rather than as standalone art. That means defining where doodles are allowed, what sizes they can be, how they align with typography, and how they behave in responsive layouts. This is where many brands fail: they add doodles without rules, then wonder why the experience feels messy.

Governance and brand fit.

Not every brand benefits from doodles in the same way. The main risk is misalignment: visuals that conflict with the brand’s promise. If the brand positions itself as ultra-premium, playful doodles may weaken perceived seriousness. If the brand operates in regulated industries, informal visuals may create confusion around authority. The solution is not to avoid doodles. The solution is to govern them.

Balancing creativity and professionalism.

Playful does not mean careless.

Good governance starts with brand guidelines that cover illustration style, use cases, and boundaries. For example, a brand can allow doodles in onboarding, help content, and social posts, but restrict them in legal terms, billing escalations, and security messaging. This prevents tone clashes that can damage trust.

Governance also includes accessibility. Line work should have sufficient contrast, icons should not rely on colour alone, and doodles should not be the only way a user understands a step. Doodles should support text, not replace it, so that the experience remains inclusive and clear.

Audience preferences and culture.

Meaning shifts across demographics.

Different demographics read visuals differently. That is why market research still matters even for something that seems purely aesthetic. A doodle that feels fun in one market can feel childish in another. Certain symbols can also carry different meanings across regions, which introduces risk for global brands.

Teams should also account for cultural sensitivities, especially when doodles include characters, gestures, or culturally specific references. The simplest approach is often best: focus on universal shapes, simple metaphors, and product-related scenes. The more abstract the doodle, the less likely it is to offend, but also the less likely it is to clarify. The craft is finding the balance.

Measuring what actually works.

Creative decisions become more valuable when they are measurable. Doodles should not be exempt from performance thinking. If the goal is approachability, teams can measure whether people complete onboarding more often. If the goal is email engagement, teams can measure click behaviour. If the goal is social sharing, teams can measure saves, shares, and comment quality. A brand can keep the art playful while keeping the analysis disciplined.

Metrics to track and compare.

Signals that reflect real behaviour.

Useful engagement metrics include time on page, scroll depth, conversion rate, and support contact rate for pages that answer common questions. For email, open rate is a partial signal, but click-through and downstream actions matter more. For social, reach is noisy, but saves and shares often reflect genuine value.

Feedback is also a metric, even when it is qualitative. Support messages that say “this was easy to follow” are evidence. Comments that reference the doodles directly are evidence. Screenshots shared by users are evidence. The difference between guessing and learning is whether the brand captures these signals consistently.

Testing and iteration loops.

Creative systems improve through trials.

A structured way to learn is A/B testing. That can mean testing an email with and without a doodle, or testing two doodle placements to see which supports clicks without distracting from the main call to action. The same applies to manuals and help pages: one version with illustrated steps, one with text-only, then compare completion rates and support contacts.

The goal of testing is not to prove doodles are “good”. The goal is to find the conditions where they help most: which pages, which audiences, which formats, and which style constraints. Over time, those learnings become part of the brand’s operational playbook.

Where doodles are heading.

Doodles are likely to remain relevant because they solve a modern brand problem: making digital experiences feel human without requiring huge production budgets. As visual content continues to dominate communication channels, brands that develop distinctive illustration systems will have an advantage. The next evolution is not only about aesthetics. It is about interaction.

Interactive experiences and new mediums.

From illustration to participation.

Emerging technologies like augmented reality and virtual reality open up new paths for doodle-led brand moments. A doodle could become a navigational layer, a tutorial guide, or a playful overlay that teaches users how to interact with a product. The opportunity is to keep the friendliness of hand-drawn style while adding depth and motion to the experience.

Even without immersive tech, “interactive doodles” can exist today through simple web behaviours: hover states that animate, clickable illustrations that reveal steps, and guided flows that make learning feel like exploration. The key is to keep these interactions purposeful, so they teach, guide, or reduce confusion instead of simply showing off.

A practical next step for teams.

Build a system, not a one-off.

Brands that want to adopt doodles should treat them as a scalable toolkit. That means defining a small library of motifs, deciding where they are allowed, and aligning them with content goals across manuals, emails, social posts, and site pages. When the system is consistent, doodles stop being a “style choice” and become part of how the brand communicates.

As teams refine that system, they can fold doodles into broader content operations, ensuring that educational pages, onboarding assets, and support content remain both readable and distinctive. Done thoughtfully, doodles become a durable advantage: a recognisable signature that supports clarity, strengthens trust, and makes the brand easier to remember long after the page is closed.

Frequently Asked Questions.

What is the role of doodle art in web design?

Doodle art enhances brand personality and approachability, making designs more relatable and engaging for users.

How can doodles improve user engagement?

Doodles capture attention and evoke emotions, encouraging users to explore content and interact with brands.

Can doodles simplify complex information?

Yes, doodles can simplify product manuals and marketing materials, making them more digestible and engaging for users.

What psychological effects do doodles have on consumers?

Doodles lower defences and foster emotional connections, making consumers more receptive to brand messages.

How can brands effectively use doodles in their marketing?

Brands can use doodles in social media, email campaigns, and product manuals to enhance engagement and simplify messaging.

What are the future trends for doodle art in branding?

The integration of AR and VR may create interactive doodle experiences, enhancing user engagement and brand connection.

How do doodles evoke nostalgia?

Doodles often remind consumers of childhood and simpler times, creating a memorable and positive association with brands.

What are best practices for using doodles in branding?

Maintain a consistent style, ensure relevance to content, and test placements for effectiveness to enhance user experience.

Can doodles be used across different industries?

Yes, doodles can be tailored to fit various industries and branding goals, making them versatile in design.

How can brands measure the effectiveness of doodle art?

Brands can track engagement metrics, gather user feedback, and conduct A/B testing to assess the impact of doodle art.

References

Thank you for taking the time to read this lecture. Hopefully, this has provided you with insight to assist your career or business.

1. Web Design London. (2015, July 30). Web design: How great art movements have inspired web design. Web Design London. https://www.web-designlondon.co.uk/web-design-art-movements/

2. The Cecily Group. (2023, August 14). Exploring the impact of fine art on web design. The Cecily Group. https://thececilygroup.com/exploring-the-impact-of-fine-art-on-web-design/

3. Stills. (2023, November 24). Exploring the World of Surrealism in Art and Design. Stills. https://www.stills.com/articles/surrealism-in-art-and-design/

4. Muavia, A. (2023, July 25). Exploring surrealism in graphic design: Unleashing imagination. Medium. https://medium.com/@ameermuaviaa116/exploring-surrealism-in-graphic-design-unleashing-imagination-3a7d97696176

5. Fussell, G. (n.d.). 5 ideas for using abstract art in your website designs. Shutterstock. https://www.shutterstock.com/blog/abstract-art-in-website-designs

6. Kittl. (2025, February 14). Doodle art trend: How to create it and where to use it. Kittl Blog. https://www.kittl.com/blogs/doodle-art-trend-how-to-create-and-use-it/

7. Simplified. (2021, May 3). 10 ways to use doodle art in web design. Simplified. https://simplified.com/blog/design/10-ways-to-use-doodle-art-in-web-design

8. DesignBro. (2021, October 12). How doodling is taking brands graphic design by storm. DesignBro. https://designbro.com/blog/inspiration/doodling-brands-graphic-design/

9. McCallister, N. (2023, October 24). Master the art of doodle graphics in your content in 2023. EntreResource. https://entreresource.medium.com/master-the-art-of-doodle-graphics-in-your-content-in-2023-e45704361a62

10. Jotform. (2009, October 15). How to design a website: 7 key principles for visually appealing websites. Jotform. https://www.jotform.com/blog/how-to-make-a-web-design-look-good/

Key components mentioned

This lecture referenced a range of named technologies, systems, standards bodies, and platforms that collectively map how modern web experiences are built, delivered, measured, and governed. The list below is included as a transparency index of the specific items mentioned.

ProjektID solutions and learning:

• CORE [Content Optimised Results Engine] - https://www.projektid.co/core

• Cx+ [Customer Experience Plus] - https://www.projektid.co/cxplus

• DAVE [Dynamic Assisting Virtual Entity] - https://www.projektid.co/dave

• Extensions - https://www.projektid.co/extensions

• Intel +1 [Intelligence +1] - https://www.projektid.co/intel-plus1

• Pro Subs [Professional Subscriptions] - https://www.projektid.co/professional-subscriptions

Web standards, languages, and experience considerations:

• SVG

• WCAG

Platforms, brands and implementation tooling:

• Apple - https://www.apple.com

• Dropbox - https://www.dropbox.com

• Gucci - https://www.gucci.com

• Knack - https://www.knack.com

• Mailchimp - https://www.mailchimp.com

• Make.com - https://www.make.com

• Replit - https://www.replit.com

• Squarespace - https://www.squarespace.com

• Threadless - https://www.threadless.com

• World Wildlife Fund - https://www.worldwildlife.org

Devices and computing history references:

• LCD

• OLED

---